Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether their are marries or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion
In this contemporary world job market has become highly competitive. This has resulted in job providers screen the private details of job seekers, other than their academic qualification and professional experience. Eventhough, there are constructive arguments in this subject, it is vital for an organization to get to know the personal background of a job seeker.
Firstly, this will help the interviewers to select a correct candidate to fit into a tem. This will be very important for a smooth function of a department. For instance, a group will consists of members, with outgoing personalities, while if an individual is more reserved, he will not fit the team. This will ultimately negatively impact the department’s performance.
In addition, the employers should investigate the marital status of the interviewee. This is to make sure whether they will be suitable for the working conditions. For example, married people cannot be recruited for jobs such as external auditing, as it requires extensive travelling and long working hours, which workers with family will be afford to do it. Therefore, marital status and family background should be studied before the recruitment.
However, some personal information clarification may not be suitable for job recruitments. The information regarding race and religion will not be appropriate. These will affect the brand name of the organization. Asa result, the interviewers should only source for individual information, which are relevant to the vacancies.
When all the above are considered, detailed investigation of personal data of a candidate should be performed for the betterment of an organization. This will enhance the collaboration among the department members and will satisfy the individual staff as well. On the other hand, these information should be suitable for job in offer.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-02-19 | tvaishnavi | 61 | view |
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Tourism is important to many countries. However its disadvantages should be overlooked. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of tourism and give your opinion. 67
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 81
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- Topic When choosing a job the salary is the most important consideration To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 254, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or jobs such as external auditing, as it requires extensive travelling and long w...
^^
Line 9, column 281, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'these informations'?
Suggestion: this information; these informations
...idual staff as well. On the other hand, these information should be suitable for job in offer.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1582.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53146853147 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30041779053 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566433566434 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.8923507705 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.8888888889 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8888888889 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72222222222 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.4128256513 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29933669109 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0968420755324 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0713699448626 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171630645425 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049158597144 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.