In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them. Sometimes the government has to pay for this care.
Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experiences
The rapid increase in ageing population in recent years has placed more importance on elderly homes around the cities of Britain. There are many privately owned homes as well as state sponsored homes. In my personal view, these centres should be financially supported by the government.
Firstly, the majority of the elders go in search of homes for elders, mainly due to the disputes with their family members. As a result, the family members of these elders will not support financially for their day to day living. Due to this, government should take initiativies to financially support these elders.
Secondly, the elders are the senior citizens of this country. Their tax income has been invested for the country's development so far. Hence, the return from those investments should be rewarded the to the elders, who have contributed towards major portion of tax income.
Thirdly, the financial situation of their family will also restrict allocation towards medical and well being of older member of that family. Especially, the medical care, hospitalization and drugs are highly expensive today. Only the families with high living standards could afford this. Since the majority of the families live below the acceptable living standards level, the assistance of the government is mandatory.
In summary, the older generation of the country should be financially supported by the government. This is mainly, due to respective family's wealth position may differ, pay back their tax contribution and personal family disputes may push them to be alone. Moreover, state sponsored centres will help the country to improve the living standards of their citizens
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-10 | cruchiji@gmail.com | 56 | view |
| 2018-05-20 | Fergielicioso | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | cruchiji@gmail.com | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | cruchiji@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2019-08-25 | Akilan | 67 | view |
- Nowadays people mostly use cars rather than bicycles as a transportation preference What effects are caused by this trend What can be done to encourage the public to use bicycles 78
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.Discuss both these views and give yo 67
- The above line graph interprets the changes in the amount and type of 3 different fast food consumed by Australian teenagers over a period of 25 years starting from 1975. 67
- The graph below show the propotion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- It is generally accepted that families are not as close as they used to be.Give some reasons why this change has happened and suggest how families could be brought closer together.Include any relevant examples from your experience. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, in summary, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1412.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36882129278 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70758210991 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566539923954 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.4378980865 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.25 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4375 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198385143278 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650074398561 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427445968916 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105321077651 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384905639912 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.