The graph below shows the percentage change in places where students lived over five decades. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph gives information about student accommodation from the 1960s to the 2000s. It shows the percentage of students who stayed in the different types of student accommodation during this time period.
In the 1960s, most students lived in a shared house or flat with other students or were paying guests with a host family. 35 percent of students lived in each of these places. A smaller percentage either lived in a student hall of residence or stayed at home with their family. By the 2000s, however, these figures had seen significant changes. The number of students living in shared accommodation had risen by twice as much, to 70 percent, while those living with a host family had fallen to just 5 percent. Figures for students living in a hall of residence and with their own family had also seen changes, but these were less marked.
A more detailed look at the graph reveals that overall changes were not always steady. While the number of students living in shared accommodation rose each decade, the change was most noticeable in the 1980s, when the figure rose sharply from 40 precent to percent. This significantly widened the gap between the other types of accommodation. The number of students staying with their own family declined steadily, then stagnated in the 1980s and 1990s, before rising again in the 2000s. Meanwhile, the number of students staying in halls of residence fluctuated, with student numbers rising and falling twice during this time period.
Clearly there were changes in the types of accommodation that students opted for between the 1960s and the 2000s, but the large increase in the number of students living in shared accommodation with other students has been particularly noticeable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-05 | hannah14032002 | 27 | view |
| 2023-01-05 | hannah14032002 | 11 | view |
| 2022-09-15 | trachanhkhongmat | 82 | view |
| 2017-02-20 | yenngoc | 73 | view |
- The maps below show changes in the Borrowmeade area in recent times Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- In some cultures the old age is more valued while in some cultures youth is more valued Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The chart below gives information about the level oof education of Bulgarian people who wanted to go and live in another country in 2002, 2006 and 2008.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature, and make comparisons where rele 73
- The graph below shows the percentage change in places where students lived over five decades Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- What should we do to draw more children to outdoor activities instead of playing electronic games too much? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1452.0 965.302439024 150% => OK
No of words: 287.0 196.424390244 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05923344948 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64832659806 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.463414634146 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 426.6 283.868780488 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9465530669 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.714285714 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.21428571429 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14677485258 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658569095487 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0372374197081 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112898711648 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267839404478 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.