The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.
The line graph compares the proportion of tourists to England Who visited four differents types of Brighton attractions over a 21 years period from 1980 to 2010.
It is clear from the line graph that the percentage of visitors to the Pavillion and Pier rose, there were sharp decreases in the figures for the Art Gallery and Festival during the research period.
In 1980, the percentage visiting the Festival was highest, at about 30%, while the figure for Pier was significantly decreased by 10%. Meanwhile, approximately 21% of tourist to England Who visited the Pavillion compared to only less than 21% of the Art Gallery. In 1985, the rate of visitors to the Art Gallery increased slightly to roughly 39%, whereas the percentage visiting Pavillion and Pier slowly rose of 28% and 15%, respectively. Particularly after 1990, the percentage of Pavillion dramatically went up to approximately 50% in 1995.
After 1995, although the proportion of tourists to the Pavillion decreased to about 30% in 2010, it was above the starting figure of the period and became the highest figure compared to other attractions. Meanwhile, the percentage visiting the Pier was steadily increased to above 20%, whereas the figure for the Art Gallery dramatically declined to below 10%. At the same time, the proportion of visitors to the Festival remained steady, at 29%.
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005 67
- The map below is of the town of Canterbury. A new school (S) is planned for the area. The map shows two possible sites for the school. 67
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in1930 and 2010 78
- The charts below show the results of a survey about what people of different age groups say makes them most happy. 67
- Expenditure on fast foods by income groups,UK 1990 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1138.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12612612613 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85395110834 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486486486486 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 342.0 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3775911982 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.444444444 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270972117446 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11586780709 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12920028419 0.0843802449381 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199693816037 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.152633383325 0.0819641961636 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.