The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts illustrate the proportions of annual expenditure on five different categories in UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
It is clear that teachers stood out as being paid far more than the others, while those of insurance was trivial. Overall, almost all the total spending increased slightly, with the except for minimal declines in the data of staffs 'salaries and resources.
As is observed, the largest amount of money was spent on teachers ' salaries at exactly 40%, whereas those of insurance was sharply lower at merely 2% in 1981. In comparison, 15% of school expenditure was spent for resources, which exactly equal to the figure for the facilities. Moreover, expenditure of staffs 'salaries occupied almost one third of expenditure at about 30%
Those of teachers ' salaries still remained the biggest cost by 1981 and ending at 45% in 2001. An decline can be witnessed in the data of resources to 9%, while facilities expenditure showed an opposite trend, rising to 23%. Moreover, during the period shown, insurance expenditure was four-fold bigger, rising from 2% to 8%. In contrast, the figure for insurance was still insignificant
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-25 | Noah1997 | 33 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-11 | Pamela K | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-19 | Saeed Najd Ataei | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-04 | Abimbola1 | 78 | view |
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisolls where relevant. 56
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second paragraph shows the green house gas emission which result from this energy use 57
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisolls where relevant. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 67, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st amount of money was spent on teachers salaries at exactly 40%, whereas those o...
^^
Line 3, column 374, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st one third of expenditure at about 30% Those of teachers salaries still remain...
^^^^
Line 4, column 19, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...diture at about 30% Those of teachers salaries still remained the biggest cost...
^^
Line 4, column 97, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'A' instead of 'An' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: A
...cost by 1981 and ending at 45% in 2001. An decline can be witnessed in the data of...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, still, third, whereas, while, except for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 964.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12765957447 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77170025757 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595744680851 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.536436297 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.111111111 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104631993626 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0502191859689 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0849800029479 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.096130468024 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109574194613 0.0819641961636 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.