The table below gives information about consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.
The table illustrates the proportions of national expenditures in Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden and Turkey on three categories of items in 2002. Overall what stands out from the table is that all five nations spent most on food, drinks and tobacco compared to leisure and education which represented the least expenditures in the same countries.
Looking at the details of food, drinks and tobacco, Turkey used up 32.14%, which was exactly two times higher than that of Italy at 16.36%. Ireland was the second greatest spender at 28.91%, being considerably greater than Spain (18.80%) and Sweden (15.77%) respectively. Turning to clothing and footwear items, Italy laid out the majority 9% as opposed to remaining four countries around 6%.
With regards to leisure and education, the total investments in all nations stood under 5%. While Turkey constituted the highest expenditure (4.35%), Spain spent the least (1.98%).
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | Noah1997 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | shayma | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | phungnguyen1611 | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | IVANTRUONG | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | IVANTRUONG | 11 | view |
- As mass communication and transport continue to grow, societies are becoming more and more alike leading to a phenomenon known as globalization. Some people fear that globalization will inevitably lead to the total loss of cultural identity.To what extent 90
- Some people think that a sense of competition in children should be encouraged Others believe that children who are taught to co operate rather than compete become more useful adults Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your 84
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree?What other measures do you think might be effective? 76
- The two charts show the main sources of energy in the USA in 1980 and 1990.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisions where relevant. 79
- Scientists and the news media are presenting ever more evidence of climate change. Governments cannot be expected to solve this problem. It is the responsibility of individuals to change their lifestyle to prevent further damage.What are your views? 96
Comments
I will again rewrite it sir.
I will again rewrite it sir. Thank you.
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
No. of Words: 145 200
Minimum 150 words wanted
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.5 out of 9
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 7 10
No. of Words: 145 200
No. of Characters: 739 1000
No. of Different Words: 92 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.47 4.0
Average Word Length: 5.097 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.624 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 51 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 40 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 22 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 16 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.714 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.408 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.286 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.437 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.667 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.054 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 775.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 145.0 196.424390244 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34482758621 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.47010008196 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64423182608 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.675862068966 0.547539520022 123% => OK
syllable_count: 217.8 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6959953165 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.714285714 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.71428571429 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0663882562618 0.215688989381 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0302826757624 0.103423049105 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413105590667 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0426517977324 0.15604864568 27% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491655183985 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.