Some people believe that schools should group their pupils according to academic ability. Others believe students should be grouped regardless of academic ability. Write an essay supporting one side of this debate.
Different methods of classifying students in schools have been at the center if global debates these days. There are two different attitudes, many advocate to arrange them according to the academic knowledge, however, others assert, it is best to sort them haphazardly. This essay will prove the advantages of sorting students according to academic level due to increasing aristocracy, also, make competitive circumstances in order to encourage acquiring a higher degree.
Firstly, the identity of each society would be enhanced in the whole world by increasing the number of the prominent scientist in a country. Therefore, nurturing talented and gifted student would be the best way of reaching this purpose. This could happen by sorting talented student and educating them well. Kharezmi school in Iran is a salient example, the students have a good reputation for intelligence in all over the world. They also record the number of inventions which have great influence on the identity of Iran among developed countries.
Secondly, the atmosphere which students spend the most of their life can play the crucial role in the academic improvement. Peer pressure can be a pulling factor among students in achieving a higher academic degree. It can be easily seen in Chinese colleges. Many Chinese students applying for higher educated which encourage others students to do so. Thus, it is clear that being in a right position would help to broaden the minds. Consequently, grouping people by their knowledge levels would rise the number of well-educated people as a whole.
Overall, by analyzing the positive ramification of grouping students by their academic ability, it is obvious that students would be more eager to acquiring academic degree regarding peer pressure, and it apparently enhances the number of prominent scientific as a whole.
- Today, the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold.To what extenet do you agree or disagreed? 61
- Some people believe that no one should be allowed to continue working after age 65 However others say there should not be a limitation on age and anyone should be allowed to work regardless of their age Discuss both views and give your opinion and include 83
- Some people become famous when they are young. This is a good or a bad thing? 61
- Today people buy things that they do not need because of advertisement. how far do you agree? 73
- You are going on a short holiday soon and would like to invite a friend to join you. Write a letter to him/her and say– Explain why you need a holiday.– Explain why you want your friend to come.– Where and when do you want to go? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 143, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun advocate seems to be countable; consider using: 'many advocates'.
Suggestion: many advocates
...ays. There are two different attitudes, many advocate to arrange them according to the academ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 149, Rule ID: EAGER_TO[1]
Message: With 'eager to', use the base form of the verb: 'acquire'.
Suggestion: acquire
...us that students would be more eager to acquiring academic degree regarding peer pressure...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1559.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33904109589 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85892043697 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558219178082 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.182243914 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.933333333 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4666666667 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238410044614 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754194526211 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519128311534 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152460471506 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0520136438552 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.