The table below shows statistics about the top five countries for international tourism in
2012 and 2013.
The table compares the top five countries regarding the numbers of visitors and the money spent by those visitors in the years 2012 and 2013.
It is clear that France was the most popular tourist attraction over the period shown. In contrast, the US earned by far the most revenue from tourism.
In 2012, 83 million tourists traveled to France, and the US was the second most visited country, with 66.7 million tourists. There were under 58 million visitors coming to Spain and China, compared to only 46.4 million tourists visiting Italy. While China received 2 million fewer visitors than in the previous year, the other countries experienced a slight increase of from 1 to 4 million tourists in 2013.
The amount of money spent by tourists visiting the USA rose from $126.2 billion in 2012 to $139.6 billion in 2013 and these figures were twice as high as those for the others. Spain got the second highest amount of tourist income, increasing from $56.3 billion to $60.4 billion, followed by France, China and Italy. Although the number of tourists fell significantly in 2013, Chinese revenue from tourism rose by 1.7 billion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-01 | clarashelomita | 78 | view |
| 2018-12-21 | Le Ngoc Van Anh | 11 | view |
- The charts below show household spending patterns in two countries between 1980 and 2008. 73
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The table below shows statistics about the top five countries for international tourism in2012 and 2013. 78
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life.Others think it is better to work for different organisations.Discuss boththese views and give your own opinion 78
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, second, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 936.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.875 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34594804338 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572916666667 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3903658897 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110766077904 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0525321075952 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629879641998 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0832260318531 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0714074445731 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.