The chart below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two pie charts describe the percentages of one British university’s undergraduates who could speak other languages than English in 2000 and 2010. There were the interesting changes among the languages spoken by British students during the 10-years period.
At the first glance, Spanish was the most popular language and it became more popular after a decade with the increase of 5% Spanish-speaking students. In contrast, students who could speak French beside English fell from 15% to 10% in 10 years. Moreover, the number of British students who only spoke English were getting fewer by the significant 10% decrease from 2000 to 2010. German was spoken by the percentage of the student which accounted for the same proportions 10%.
Students who were able to speak another language which is different from English, Spanish, French, and German rose 5% from 10% to 15% after 10 years. In the similar trend, the proportions of British students who could speak two other languages were getting larger by the rise of 5% in the period 2000-2010.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to spend your money on an object that will last a long time than it is to spend your money on an experience (such as a vacation, concert, etc.) that will last only a short time. Use speci 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn the factsUse specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- The crime rate among teenagers has increased dramatically in many countries Discuss some possible reasons for this increase and suggest solutions 92
- In many countries today there are many highly qualified graduates without employment What factors may have caused this situation and what in your opinion can should be done about it 71
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both these views and gi 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 889.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16860465116 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79047358596 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540697674419 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.0720835792 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 111.125 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32974058844 0.215688989381 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164550064445 0.103423049105 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0909891703848 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.268872076582 0.15604864568 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553402671684 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.