At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.
Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages?
Several countries have seen the young population pyramid recently, which implies the number of young citizens is larger than the older civilians. I believe this phenomenon is beneficial to the economy of the countries in many ways that are definitely off-set the drawbacks.
Young people contribute to a great labour force leading the country to be more competitive in the economy. A country with healthy and young labour is likely to be more attractive to foreign direct investment because it offers the investor a stable force of employee. Moreover, goods and services produced would have a better-consumed market due to the large young consumers. The economy would grow the best in an economy with your generation. This argument has been proved by the real case of China and India. The world economy has witnessed the incredible economic growth of the two countries with youngest and healthiest labour force in recent decades.
Dominant number of young people benefits government by pension relief. The taxes collected can be used to build schools, industrial zones and invested in infrastructure instead of using for homes for the aged and pension. Thus, a young-pyramid population reduces the state’s budget burden. For instance, the Vietnamese government expenditure is spent mainly in building roads and educational institutes instead of building health care for the old citizens.
In conclusion, a nation with a predominance of young citizen might have some disadvantages. However, the benefits of young population listed above lead me to a concrete belief that it has more advantage than the population with larger number of old people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-24 | Sushmabenarji | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | julieehung | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-22 | happyhappy | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-11 | enassar | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | WAFA | 78 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 78
- A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 78
- 4-Day WorkweekThe popular 5-day workweek has long been a staple in U.S. business. With employees working 8 hours a day for a total of 40 hours a week, it has been seen as a model of efficiency. However, some companies and government agencies have begun co 76
- Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to spend your money on an object that will last a long time than it is to spend your money on an experience (such as a vacation, concert, etc.) that will last only a short time. Use speci 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, moreover, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1403.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3754789272 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92972449628 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574712643678 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1357135988 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.214285714 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6428571429 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.35714285714 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237873744975 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0789292342986 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625272631858 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152191238899 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0685859731346 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.