When famous people such as actors, athletes and rock stars give their opinions, many people listen. Do you think we should pay attention to these opinions? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Paying attention to celebrities’ comments or ignoring them is a personal choice. But I would pay attention to a celebrity’s talk only if he is talking of the field he is concerned with. These reasons for my opinion are listed and elaborated as follows:
People become famous in their respective field because they have proved themselves in that field. Because of the person’s knowledge and experience, he is valued and respected. For instance, the retired cricket player Kapil Dev. He was the captain of Indian cricket team. So if he gives reviews of the game he has just witnessed as an audience, and suggest that the game should have been played using other strategies, people are interested in knowing what he says because he has experience that and has knowledge about it. Because he is the one under whose regime India had won it’s first world cup match.
But there are cases in which an actor enters politics and contests elections. He works on his films and simultaneously works in politics. The gives speeches in favor of the party and attends political rallies during elections. If such an actor comments about politics and government, I would definitely not pay attention to his remarks because he does not dedicate his entire time and energy to politics. His expertise is acting and hence his remarks on acting and films would be much valued. And as he is focusing on other projects, his knowledge regarding politics would be shallow.
Hence, one should think wisely before paying attention to anybody’s opinion. One should judge the person’s background and field of expertise before following any celebrity or a famous person.
- Some people prefer to live in a small town others prefer a big city. Which place would you prefer to live in? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 85
- The first step to self-knowledge is rejection of the familiar.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your p 50
- The following argument was made in a newspaper editorial:“The autonomy of any country is based on the strength of its borders; if the number of illegal immigrants entering a country cannot be checked, both its economy and national identity are endangere 89
- ISSUE: Claim: The emergence of the online "blogosphere" has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United States.Reason: When anyone can publish political opinions easily, standards for covering news and political topics will ine 90
- Hydroelectricity-integrated essay 80
Sentence: The gives speeches in favor of the party and attends political rallies during elections.
Description: A noun, plural, common is not usually followed by a noun, plural, common
Suggestion: Refer to gives and speeches
flaws:
No. of Different Words: 159 200
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.176 21.0
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 24 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 275 350
No. of Characters: 1336 1500
No. of Different Words: 159 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.072 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.858 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.551 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 101 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 72 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 50 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 32 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.176 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.833 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.529 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.32 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.526 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.172 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5