Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are they key to reducing traffic accidents. Others, however, believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
In the many parts of the world, traffic safety is always a top priority to concern. There are those who argue that strict punitive measures imposing on driving offenders are the good solution in minimizing traffic accidents, while others say believe that improving traffic infrastructures, such as building road safety, could be more effective. In this essay, i will explore both sides of this controversial issue.
It can not to deny that strict punishments could give immediate effects on reducing traffic accidents. These strict punitive measures, for example, might be charging huge fines, long...
- The table below shows the results of survey to find out what members of a city sprots club think about the club's activities, facilities and opening hours.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make any comparisions wh 80
- University should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject.To what extend do you agree or disagree? 80
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 53
- In many countries, the proportion of older people is steadily increasing. Does this trend have positive or negative effects on society? 88
- The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries.Summarise the imformation by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 45
Sentence: As a results, the traffic participants, for instance, might drive more safely in order to avoid the these punishments.
Description: The token the is not usually followed by a determiner/pronoun, plural
Suggestion: Refer to the and these
flaws:
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.038 0.07
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 13 15
No. of Words: 310 350
No. of Characters: 1615 1500
No. of Different Words: 162 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.196 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.21 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.888 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 126 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 101 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 62 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 43 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.846 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.646 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.692 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.372 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.553 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.038 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5