Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extend do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
It is said that governments should strict the law of waste recycling to force household to recycle their rubbish. In my opinion, the laws are essential for the effective recycling of waste. The appropriate laws can help people bear the benefits and emergency of waste recycling and thus raise the proportion of people who join the recycled waste battle.
Laws make people pay attention and be more concerned about the environment. Some policies can be launched to increase the number of people who recycle garbage. Governments can ask household to classify households’ garbage before throwing out the trash container. Moreover, the benefits of waste recycling should be taught at school so that children take place and influence their parents at home. People may not realize clearly what they receive from doing trash recycling other than wasting time. Therefore, governments could give them information about the huge benefits and the worse sequences of releasing too much rubbish to the earth.
Governments can also do the propagation through media to encourage people’s awareness of protecting the environment and save sources of producing products. Events and art competitions about recycled rubbish would attract people to the matter. For instance, an art sculpture made by recycled plastic bottles putting at the city center may send to the citizens a message about recycling those bottles which are still usable.
By the way of conclusion, recycling trash in households can be done by various ways. Thanks to governments’ policies and laws, I believe the number of recycled garbage will increase day by day
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-29 | nobitaa | 84 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.Summa 93
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both these views and gi 61
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995 – 2002.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, for instance, by the way, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1383.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3813229572 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88734306736 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5953307393 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6002915439 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7857142857 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3571428571 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369700371126 0.244688304435 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13149953381 0.084324248473 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0768211286682 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221237850758 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0901683702583 0.056905535591 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.