Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recyle more of their waste?
Environmental problem is such a widespread concern including recyling.I totally agree to the statement that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. In my opinion, this should be compulsory.
First and foremost, recycling is economical. After being used, things often be thrown away while they can be recycled and reformed into the others for different aims. For example, when you have drunk a bottle of Coca Cola, then you send it to the factory, its materials will be used to make some new products. Recycling means making use of things and their components so that the national economy can save countless money and the resources will not be used up soon.
On the other hand, our environment is endangered. One of the main reasons is the waste itself. You can see on the TV thousands of poor marine creatures die from the rubbish under the water every year. Furthermore, we even have the waste "mountain" which poison not only our daily lives but also our next generations' lives.
As far as I am concerned, laws that making people recycling more of their waste should be passed as soon as possible because of the 2 reasons I've just mentioned above. There should be some strict punishments for people not following the laws. And recycling need to be broadcasted so that citizens know the advantages of it.
In a nutshell, I strongly suggest that governments have a responsibility to make recycle is a legal requirement.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-06-29 | nobitaa | 84 | view |
2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 61 | view |
2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 56 | view |
2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recyle more of their waste 87
- Some people choose to eat no meat or fish. They believe that this is not only better for their own health butalso benefits the world as a whole. Discuss this view and give your own opinion.Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples fro 61
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much as information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. others believe that information is too important and valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both these views and give yo 56
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their wast 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 71, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: I
...a widespread concern including recyling.I totally agree to the statement that the...
^
Line 7, column 143, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I've
...on as possible because of the 2 reasons Ive just mentioned above. There should be s...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, then, while, for example, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1237.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92828685259 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94936985795 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.621513944223 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 387.0 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.3201483306 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.3571428571 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9285714286 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92857142857 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294196231082 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909157507047 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714971038669 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162924192292 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519407320441 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.