TPO 21 Integrated
The professor explains three arguments opposing the points stated in the reading passage about beneficiary of genetically modified trees.
First, the professor argues that natural trees are more prone to die in harsh conditions and they are vulnerable to new and unknown pests. For instance, if they infected by a new pest or experience adverse climate, all of the genetically modified trees will be damage because they are genetically uniformed. But some natural trees may survive during such conditions due to genetic diversity. Therefore, this advantage has repudiated by professor through mentioned explanations.
Second, the reading passage states that genetically modified trees have some economical advantages like more fruits and faster growth which differentiate them from natural trees. Nevertheless, the professor draws attention to hidden costs of genetically modified trees which farmers need to pay for seeds of trees every time they want to cultivate and they can not collect seeds and growth them. Thus, these hidden charges trigger professor to reject this idea.
Third and last, the professor states that genetically modified trees are more dangerous to environment due to the fact that they use most of resources and out compete the natural trees. So, by wiping out natural trees, genetically modified trees damage environment more than expectations. Hence, this claim has been declined by the professor either.
In summary, the professor has gone totally against the benefits presented in the reading passage. It states that genetically modified trees are not so beneficial because they are vulnerable to unknown pests and scarce climate conditions, can damage environment by wiping out natural trees and charging more cost to users.
- Nowadays with the invention of the microwave and with the popularity of fast food restaurants food has become easier to prepare than ever Do you think microwave ovens and fast food restaurants are beneficial to society Use specific reasons and examples to 88
- If you could go back to some time and place in the past when and where would you go Why Use specific reasons and details to support your choice 69
- In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay in order to do so. A mandatory policy requiring companies to offer their empl 80
- when people move to another country, some of them decide to follow the customs of the new country while some others keep their own customs. Compare these two choices. Which one do you prefer? Support your answer with specific details. 66
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 216, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...new pest or experience adverse climate, all of the genetically modified trees will be dama...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 134, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the resources') or simply say ''most resources''.
Suggestion: most of the resources; most resources
...vironment due to the fact that they use most of resources and out compete the natural trees. So, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, third, thus, for instance, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1497.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 269.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56505576208 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75872501374 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527881040892 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0605621382 49.2860985944 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.153846154 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6923076923 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84615384615 7.06452816374 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.433406766466 0.272083759551 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168589950001 0.0996497079465 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122740860711 0.0662205650399 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261854218173 0.162205337803 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0723789281965 0.0443174109184 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.3589403974 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.2367328918 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.