In the future, it seems more difficult to live on the Earth. Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planet to live, such as Mars. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement
People believe that living on the Earth has been becoming more challenging and pouring more money looking for an alternative planet to dwell on seems to be a promising solution. In my opinion, such measure is not necessary.
There are reasons to believe that life on a foreign planet is almost unfeasible and impossible. Firstly, the living condition on the distant planet such as Mars is more extreme and inhabitable in contrast to that of the Earth. As a result, humans are far more from being adaptable to such an inhospitable environment. Secondly, it would take years and even decades to travel to such place owing to the enormous distance between the planets and mankind’s technological constraints, let alone those beyond the solar system.
Furthermore, I am of the opinion that allocating additional budget to improve and enhance the living condition on the Earth brings about more benefits than the aforementioned efforts. For instance, government and executive bodies could consider injecting more money in organizing campaigns to raise public awareness on the significance of recycling and saving materials such as plastic, glass and paper. By doing this, a noticeable reduction of natural resources exploitation may be expected, which results in a more sustainable environment. On top of that, greater funds should be invested in developing more advanced technologies that minimize the greenhouse gas emission and hence slow down the global warming.
In conclusion, the Earth, albeit getting tougher to live on, still appear to have rooms for further improvement and thus, seeking for possibilities for foreign is not needed at the moment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-13 | hana99 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-21 | vantran2297 | 89 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | Vu Thi Hoang Ngan | 84 | view |
| 2018-11-26 | dungha23 | 73 | view |
| 2018-02-21 | sho2501 | 89 | view |
- Pros and Cons of extreme adventure sports 73
- Topic: It is becoming increasingly popular to have a year off between finishing school and going to university. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this? 66
- The purpose of conducting scientific research projects is for practical use rather than for the sake of doing research itself. Do you agree? 77
- Learning a new language at an early age is helpful for children. Is it more positive for their future aspect or have some adverse effects? Agree or disagree? 86
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree?What other measures do you think might be effective? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 454, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
...this, a noticeable reduction of natural resources exploitation may be expected, which res...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, still, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as a result, in contrast to, in my opinion, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1406.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36641221374 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00910569623 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641221374046 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2603147318 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.818181818 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8181818182 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 18.2727272727 7.06120827912 259% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30455765262 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108790159019 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0758605900344 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17886984075 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0813073623954 0.056905535591 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.