The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two bar graphs illustrate the career paths of university and postgraduate students excluding full-time job after they left school in the UK in 2008. In general, both graduates and postgraduates mostly went for higher education and lots of them were unemployed notwithstanding, a mere of students worked as a volunteer.
To begin with, there were 29,665 university students enrolled in another program and it made this career option to be the most popular one. The second large number of student decided to work for a part-time job. Unfortunately, unemployed graduates were 16,235 people in 2008 and there were only 3,500 people who volunteered in a voluntary program.
In term of postgraduates’ career, the majority of postgraduates straightforward studied further after graduation from school but unlikely the graduates, most of them worked in a part-time job that accounted for 2,535 people. A bulk of students which were 1,625 people did not work in any job position and voluntary work was opted by 345 students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-02-17 | aigerim-09 | 40 | view |
| 2020-08-21 | Nikki patel | 78 | view |
| 2017-10-12 | Mr. Fithroni | 84 | view |
- A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 78
- In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organizationstarted issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conservingresources and recycling materials. Companies that receive 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People behave differently when they wear different clothes. Do you agree that different clothes influence the way people behave? Use specific examples to support your answer. 70
- Advertising discourages people from being different individuals by making us want to be and to look the same To what extent do you agree or disagree 80
- The graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010, and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comp 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, second, in general, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 869.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2987804878 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20225302713 2.65546596893 121% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628048780488 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5114064721 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.142857143 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200553323558 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0962720210893 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425586425338 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145881570055 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392497627809 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.