Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language. Do you think this is a positive or negative social development?
Scientists think that our next generations will use a global language to interact with each other. While this tendency might exert several negative effects on humanity, I still believe that it is a positive development.
On the one hand, the downsides of this trend can not be overlooked. The dominance of one language might gradually eliminate the linguistic diversity in many countries across the world, which is a pricipal cause for the cultural assimilation. As a matter of fact, some individuals, the young generation in particular, may underestimate the value and meaning of their language, greatly damaging their own hometown' s traditions and identity. For example, if people aroung the world spoke the same language, foreign visitors to Vietnam would no longer have a chance to enjoy the rich historical heritage of Vietnamese language and cultures.
On the other hand, this tendency offers several practical benefits to society as a whole. First, using a universal language will give people countless opportunities to integrate into the global working environment, which is essential in the globalization era where different cultures cross. Without facing the language barriers, well-educated and productive individuals would possess a golden selling point to work for powerful multinational companies as well as do business wiith foreign partners. This would enable them to enjoy a more decent standards of living, positively affecting the national economic expansion. Secondly, people can also access to a huge storage of information in the same language from online platform, most of which are free of charge or just require a small fee, to heighten their intellect. For instance, rather than reading boring textbooks, most Vietnamese students will be able to enjoy the websites which are available in a global language to acquire a great deal of knowledge of any aspect of life in which they are interested.
In conlusion, although there are some drawbacks of this trend, I still believe that using a universal language is necessary for humanity’s future social development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-12 | quynhhuong656 | 89 | view |
- Some people think a job not only provides income but also social life Others think it is better to develop social life with people you do not work with Discuss both view and give your own opinion 75
- Some people think that good health is very important to every person, so medical service should not be run by profit-making companies. Do the advantages of private health care outweigh the disadvantages 61
- In recent years, the structure of a family and the role of its members are gradually changing. What kinds of changes that occur? Do you think these changes are positive or negative? 73
- Some people think that governments should ban dangerous sports. While others think that people should have freedom to do any sports or activity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- Some people think that good health is very important to every person so medical service should not be run by profit making companies Do the advantages of private health care outweigh the disadvantages 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 151, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is necessary for humanity's future social development.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, still, well, while, for example, for instance, in particular, as a matter of fact, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1771.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41590214067 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00453074003 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620795107034 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 569.7 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.3153840499 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.230769231 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1538461538 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4615384615 7.06120827912 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162307873759 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0550921123859 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411628160797 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1113418672 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463664510961 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.