The table shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufacturers in the years 2005 and 2006
The table compares the percentage of market share among different mobile phone manufacturers in the world in 2005 and 2006.
Overall, Nokia accounted for the largest percentage in the market. From 2005 to 2006, the market share of Nokia, Motorola and Sony Ericson saw a slight increase, in contrast with other companies.
In 2005, the percentage of market share of Nokia was 32.5%. This figure rose up to 35% in 2006 and remained the largest figure among all. The market share of Motorola saw a significant increase, form 17.7% in 2005 to 21.1% in 2006. The year 2006 also witnessed the increase of the market share of Sony Ericson, this figure grown to 7.4% in 2006.
In contrast, the market share of other companies declined. This figure for Samsung company fell from 12.7% to 11%. There was a decrease in the proportion of market share of LG and BenQMobile, from 6.7% and 4.9% to 6.3% and 2.4% respectively. This figure for others manufacturers went down by 3%, to 16.2% in 2006.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-16 | Lienak24 | 67 | view |
| 2021-09-15 | ujjwalsatyam 9211 | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-25 | dh.phoebe13 | view | |
| 2021-08-20 | minhpn | 73 | view |
| 2021-05-19 | dntt97 | 78 | view |
- Some people think that schools should reward students who show the best academic results, while others believe that it is more important to reward students who show improvements. Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- Many people go to university for academic study More people should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified worker such as electricians and plumbers To what extent do you agree or disagree 79
- The table illustrates the proportion of monthy household income five European countries spend on food and drink, housing, clothing and entertainment. 78
- The chart below give information about the most common sports played in New Zealand in 2002 67
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000. Summarise the information by seclecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 815.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76608187135 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54506256428 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491228070175 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.0306797681 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.0909090909 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5454545455 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.27272727273 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.469313056551 0.215688989381 218% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.200006300974 0.103423049105 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116078783904 0.0843802449381 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.325401108179 0.15604864568 209% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100397509467 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.09 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.