Some people think that it is important to have a single language as an international official language. Others think that it will make it difficult to identify countries and cause a loss of culture. Discuss both views and give your opinion?
In recent decades have witnessed an increase in the usage of international language, raising many questions of the decrease in cultural identities. Although some drawbacks of a loss of culture appear legitimate, i think application of an international official language still pays dividends.
On the one hand, There are a great number of reasons promoting the importance of using international official language. First, the removal of languages barriers among countries would be conducive to the betterment in citizens’ living standards. In fact, By speaking the same language, students could experience a more progressive and standardised learning environment in a more developed nation, promoting their career prospects and higher living social status. Second, The usage of international language is invariably associated with an economic growth in every nation. This means that some multinational companies could freely render their outsourcing services and negotiate trade deals without worrying about the restrictions of language, which act as a significant contributor to the national incomes.
On the other hand, an international official language is instrumental in the loss of cultural distinctiveness. First,If worldwide individuals speak the same language, the likelihood of their ignorance of a mother tongue is inevitable. For example, due to a high degree of concentration on learning international English, young generations in Vietnam now have a propensity to despise the values and distort the true meaning of Vietnamese language. In addition, An international language would act as a deterrent for the maintenance of religious belief, social norms and valuable traditions in one country. This could be attributed to the fact that individuals are implanted with foreign culture and other religious ideas due to learning an international language.
In conclusion, I think the usage of international language would culminate in positive repercussions in terms of better living quality and the economic development. The international community should undertake some initiatives to encourage every people to learn this kind of language in practical and effective ways
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-04 | Faramarz Abbasi | 73 | view |
- Some people think that it is good for a country’s culture to broadcast foreign films and TV show. Others,however think it is best to produce local films and shows. Discuss both views and give your opinions. 84
- In developing countries, children in rural communities have less access to education. Some people believe that the problem can be solved by providing more schools and teachers, while others think that the problem can be solved by providing computers and I 84
- Developing countries need financial help from international organizations > 67
- the pie chart shows the percentages of expenditure on different items in USA 56
- Although it is a freedom to use tobacco while some people think it should be made illegal as the same way as other drugs. To what extent do you agree or disagree？ What’s your opinion? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 213, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...of a loss of culture appear legitimate, i think application of an international o...
^
Line 6, column 117, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , If
... loss of cultural distinctiveness. First,If worldwide individuals speak the same la...
^^^
Line 6, column 204, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ge, the likelihood of their ignorance of a mother tongue is inevitable. For examp...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, still, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1880.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.85669781931 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37169816583 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548286604361 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 599.4 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2603860783 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.285714286 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9285714286 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262510648302 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0977896482724 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062156381069 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169116852833 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410370129892 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 50.2224549098 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.0 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.