The overuse of natural resources causes an ultimate exhaust of them. People have been using them to be in the swim of new styles such as making new furniture of recent design. This causes huge harm to the environment. Therefore, the government should discourage people the use of these resources. To what extent do you support or oppose the idea?
Recent satellite images taken by NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) have shown the significant reduction of green on the Earth. The organization also provided with the statistics that nearly third of forests have been chopped down for timber, house construction, etc. since 1980s. This is only one example of severe exploitation of natural resources. Therefore, governments have to launch drastic initiatives for decreasing pace of natural resources exploitation since they possess power.
Nowadays the most worrisome issue of overuse of the resources is deforestation; nevertheless, it used to be oil extraction in the last century. Forests are considered to be lung of the planet and home for a diverse variety of animals. Having destroyed 30 percent of forests all over the world, particularly in Amazonia and Siberia by private entities has substantially increased the level of air pollution resulting in greenhouse effect; moreover, it has resulted in extinction of several types of species and putting hundreds of animals in jeopardy of extinction. These facts are a global danger, therefore, the activities of companies in the industry must be controlled and discouraged as much as possible by the superb entity - government.
Governments are able to influence companies both directly and indirectly. Government’s means of direct intervention includes imposing taxes and legally limiting chopping down forests. Brazilian parliament, for instance, increased taxes on timber factories last year; this initiative has resulted in decreased exploitation of Amazonian rainforest. Indirectly governments can involve such environment protection organizations as Green Peace in influencing timber producing companies to make them understand that trees are a renewable resource, but it takes several years. Therefore, there should be a balance between chopping down trees and growing them.
Natural resources have a tendency of slow recovery. Thus, it is imperative that governments be responsible for preserving them from intense exploitation; otherwise, the consequences can be severe and irreversible.
- The line graph below shows the annual number of visits to Australia by overseas tourists. The table below gives information on the country of origin where the tourists came from. 67
- Do you agree with the following statement? Parents are the best teachers. 61
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their was 67
- Nowadays food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved the way people live? 80
- The diagrams show a structure that is used to generate electricity from wave power. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 457, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
...tiatives for decreasing pace of natural resources exploitation since they possess power. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, third, thus, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1817.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.86129032258 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30280649182 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635483870968 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.4508454057 49.4020404114 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.133333333 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26666666667 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199377743643 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619622288733 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440142099836 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119397931143 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0274315164238 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.71 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.79 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.