International community must act immediately to ensure all nations to reduce their consumption of fossil fuels e.g gas and oil. Do you agree or disagree?
It is true that we human beings have been overconsuming fossil fuels such as gas, oil, and coal in recent decades, which arise the view that global community must deal with this at once to curb their consumption of these sources. In my opinion, I strongly agree with this point of view seeing that resultant environmental problems are grave and other efficient eco-friendly alternatives are available to replace these traditional fuels.
It stands to reason that the adverse impacts of fossil fuel usage on the environment and humankind are irreversible. The average global temperature has been rising dramatically than ever before, leading to global warming, which put many nations in the jeopardy of losing their territory due to high sea level, especially those countries have long coastal line. Besides, the consumption of fossil fuels could cause air pollution resulting from greenhouse gas emissions, which is a serious problem of those nations overconsuming these such as China. It not only influence negatively flora sustainable development, but also multiplies the risk of potentially fatal diseases like lung cancer or other respiratory ailments. China, for instance, have been facing unprecedentedly frequent harmful "pink" smog stemming from toxic fumes each year as well as the ever-increasing cancer rate due to the grave consequences of overusing of fossil fuels.
There are, in actual fact, numerous clean energy which could take place these traditional one that deserve international attention. Solar and wind energy, for example, are bound to be available in all regions all over the world. Inhabitants, therefore, should install and harness them effectively and efficiently to save on the environment and simultaneously cope with the global energy crisis. It is fallacy to say that these energy are costly due to the fact that in the long run it would be the economically efficient method that save those users a great deal of money.
In conclusion, I completely advocate with the idea that global community have to act immediate ly to reduce the fossil fuel consumption.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-28 | marykim7178 | 84 | view |
| 2017-05-12 | kingnight153 | 37 | view |
| 2017-05-11 | kingnight153 | 89 | view |
- The graph below shows the changes in UK birth rate of women in 6 different ages from 1973 to 2008 78
- It is suggested that everyone wants to have a car, a television and a fridge. Do the disadvantages of this development for society outweigh the advantages? 84
- The table below shows the income and expenditure of Harckley Hall a public place for hiring over the period of three years 74
- The diagram below shows how solar panels can be used to provide electricity for domestic use 56
- Some people think that children need to study in an environment where they have to compete with each other. Others, however, believe that teamwork is more important. Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 15, Rule ID: ACTUAL_EXPERIENCE[1]
Message: Use simply 'fact'.
Suggestion: fact
...using of fossil fuels. There are, in actual fact, numerous clean energy which could take...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 422, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this energy' or 'these energies'?
Suggestion: this energy; these energies
...nergy crisis. It is fallacy to say that these energy are costly due to the fact that in the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1781.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38066465257 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02062533243 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616314199396 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.6888632188 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.416666667 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5833333333 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.75 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205234004394 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685587218154 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740582023439 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131365396731 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0654524828438 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.