What do you want most in a friend – someone who is intelligent, or someone who has a sense of humor, or someone who is reliable? Which one of these characteristics is most important to you? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your choice.
From a broad perspective, in the current state of affairs we face, in which so busy are people with their own bisinesses that rarely do they find sufficient time to socilize with others, it is not far-fetched to presume that matter of friendship plays a vital role for augmenting people's relationships. However, which tarit makes more contribution in order to establish prolonged frienships has been considered as a contentious issue. There is a growing segment of people who contend this idea that genuity is the ustmost charasteristic for a good compnaion. I personally concur with this idea, and in the ensuing paragraph, the rationale behind this opinion will be further elaborated.
First and foremost, frienship's role in hardships. There is no denyin the fact that complexity of today's world represend a wide array of challenges and put new demands on the societies. In this circumstance, individuals are constantly dealing with a plethora of obstacles requiring to overcome. In most of the cases, having not been able to solve the problems on his own, human has no other choice but relaing to their closet friends. For instance, take a juvenile, who wants to make a decision regarding the new job offer he recieved, as an example. Undoubtedly, the sense of humor will not assist this person as he needs to consult with an intelligent one who clarify various facets of his option. Therefore, thoughtful people often are accounted as trusthworthy individuals who make the frienship meangful.
Another vital point which should be taken into consideation is that an intelligent friend are usually more accountable. Needless to say that people behaviour is the indications of their personality. For instance, fun people are seeking to get pleasure their time and that is why this feature determines that the person should take an advantage of every single moment which ends up with fun! Admittedly, if one of his friends invite him to attend a part and another one ask him to undertake a particular reposibility, his choice will be the first one. In fact, they make a friend with the aim of merely having a fun. On the other hand, it comes as no surprise that people can count on their geniun friends more in their lives. Indeed, due to their characteristics, they are prepared to serve and aid their friends whenever they need them.
To wrap it up, it is more judicious to say that being intelligence is the most prominence characteristics for a friend. Not only do they smooth the difficult situation more tolerable for their friends but they also are more dutifull individual thanks to their favorable personality.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-31 | alta | 70 | view |
| 2019-08-15 | rohitbibra | 60 | view |
| 2017-05-13 | Delara | 76 | view |
| 2016-08-11 | sadra1988 | 76 | view |
| 2016-03-30 | younes.tatari | 80 | view |
- TPO 12 - Jane Austen Portrait 80
- Do you agree or disagree? It is better to relax through watching a film and reading a book than doing physical exercises? 90
- Agree or Disagree: Asking children to work in a small group is the best way to teach young children 86
- Getting the advice from friends who are older than you is more valuable than getting that from your peers. 83
- Has the ease of the cooking improved life 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 282, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'overcoming'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: overcoming
... with a plethora of obstacles requiring to overcome. In most of the cases, having not been ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 43, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nother vital point which should be taken into consideation is that an intelligent...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, regarding, so, therefore, for instance, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2190.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 437.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0114416476 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94065746776 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544622425629 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 684.0 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.6537732798 48.9658058833 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.263157895 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.10526315789 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11321791805 0.236089414692 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0366281409654 0.076458572812 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0337785640473 0.0737576698707 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0731776113114 0.150856017488 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0266587665847 0.0645574589148 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.