Tpo 23
Both of the reading and lecture are about the reduction of populations of the yellow cedar that is predominance in northwestern North America. The reading provides three reasons for this decline and then supports them. The lecture casts doubt on the claims made in the article. The professor finds all theories inappropriate.
First of all, the author of reading declares that insects like a beetle that is known as the cedar bark beetle may have affected in this occurrence. Since these types of beetles like to eat the cedar's wood; consequently, they can harm the cedar trees. This point is challenged by the lecturer. He points out that the healthy trees usually are resistance in front of the insects because their wood or bark is able to produce some toxic substances which can kill insects; hence, the insects eat trees which have died.
Second, the reading passage contends that brown bears are inclined to claw cedar’s barks because this type of tree has sugar into its bark and it goes without saying that bears love sweet substance; subsequently, this can create negative impression on cedar's power for surviving. This argument is rebutted by the professor. He claims that we have this decline in all coasts of North America including islands too; as a result, there is no bear in the island. In short they are not responsible for this disappointing happening.
Finally, the article suggests that climate change may have caused cedar trees to commence their growth in the late winter instead of in the early spring, so it can have harmful effect on their roots; conversely, the professor refutes this suggestion. He believes that a great number of trees have declined in low elevations that have warm climate and one should not forget that freezing damages can be observed in high elevations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 279, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...oubt on the claims made in the article. The professor finds all theories inappropri...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, conversely, finally, first, hence, may, second, so, then, in short, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 303.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99669966997 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58610289795 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 145.348785872 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580858085809 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.7187826955 49.2860985944 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.142857143 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6428571429 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.454475814242 0.272083759551 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131568907987 0.0996497079465 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.087354917341 0.0662205650399 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255277022638 0.162205337803 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0773157744232 0.0443174109184 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.