which one is better in your opinion? it is better to the governments spend as much money as possible exploring outer space like traveling to the moon or other planets, or they should spend this money for our basic needs on Earth.
The question is that it is better to the governments spend as much money as possible exploring outer space like traveling to the moon or other planets, or they should spend this money for our basic needs on Earth. In my perspective, everyone with regard to his private viewpoint, can maintain a specific direction toward this issue; however I want to affirm that it is kind of waste money to pay a lot for traveling to the space, while there are a lot of vital things on Earth for investing. My arguments and reasons are listed which will strengthen my point of view:
To begin with, it is axiomatic that scientific breakthrough especially in astronomy major is the greatest requirement every society; however it is not all thing. The countries can look for prosperous in other essential grounds. For instance, if the government spends much more money to build numerous schools or university, a great number of people will be able to study and boost the level of their literacy. It goes without saying that a community with its up-dated people has such a power to raise its flag in all the worldwide in diversity majors like medical, politic, and economic and list goes on.
The second reason why I refute spending extra money on spatial traveling, lies in the fact that people will live just one time; hence they need to enjoy from their life right now instead waiting for getting new results from spatial planets. The sport salons, the exiting funfairs, the equipped cinemas and the great commercial malls can improve people's spirit. Nobody could overlook this fact that a society with succulent people can defeat any power, subsequently the governments primarily have to notice to public needs.
Having discussed this issue from this point of view, I am going to empower it by following discussion. At least in my country, there are a lot of poor and homeless people who do not have enough money or even a roof for sleeping. It is task of government to provide the simplest their needs. In such a condition, it can be ridiculous to gain new information about starts or planets.
By taking all above mentioned arguments, I strongly disagree that the government dedicates a lot of money for exploring space. They are responsible to afford the most basic of requirements of people and miscellaneous things will set in next step.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-05 | petarpan7 | 90 | view |
| 2016-11-22 | peerless alex | 83 | view |
- Tpo 23 80
- do you agree or disagree? parents today are more involved in their children’s' education than were parents in the past . 92
- do you agree or disagree children should spend most of their time on studying and playing and they shouldn t be required to help family with household chores such as cleaning and cooking 84
- Do you agree or disagree?it is better to make friends with intelligent people than with the people who have a good sense of humor. 85
- do you agree or disagree?advertising can tell you a lot about a country 80
Comments
Essay evaluation report
It is task of government
It is the task of government
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 26 in 30
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 401 350
No. of Characters: 1889 1500
No. of Different Words: 224 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.475 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.711 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.555 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 124 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 92 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 66 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 45 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 26.733 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.79 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.4 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.309 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.389 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.029 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, look, second, so, then, while, at least, for instance, kind of, to begin with, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1936.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 401.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82793017456 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63424522212 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571072319202 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.7481960281 48.9658058833 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.066666667 100.406767564 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7333333333 20.6045352989 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53333333333 5.45110844103 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381109891978 0.236089414692 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119636622762 0.076458572812 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.201437994426 0.0737576698707 273% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198323560723 0.150856017488 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.161946698801 0.0645574589148 251% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 10.002688172 170% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.