Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
There is the issue of whether or not the government should devote more budget to railway rather than roads. Personally, I partially agree with this idea due to reason which will be discussed here.
On the on hand, some opponents believe that giving finance to develop roads have several advantages. From their point of view, a vast majority of people travel or commute using their private vehicles especially those who settle in the hinterland, putting a strain on roads. In this situation, traffic congestion is inevitable, whereby the people stuck in traffic or bottleneck for several hours.as we can see in some conurbation such as London and Tokyo.
They also mentioned that road accident nowadays are one of the most common reasons for individual death, so it is of paramount importance to invest funds in developing standard roads and improve those which existed to reduce bottlenecks and decline the incidence of accidents.
On the other hand, I believe that railway plays a key role in the transport system. To begin with, trains are high capacity modes of transport which have been employed in the transport of both human and loads. Therefore, they can be highly beneficial to decrease the pressure on other means of transport. Secondly, they have a reputation for their countless positive feature, convenient, fast and cheap for instance. This means they can provide passengers with a reliable means of transport which is not only are extremely safe but also have a reasonable price. So if authorities spend more money on the railway, residents will be more likely to willing to utilise the trains instead of their own cars.
In conclusion, whereas expense financial on roads infrastructure can be useful, I am of the opinion that railway progression is a decisive factor in inhibition of current transport system problems.
- There has been a dramatic growth in the number of people studying at universities in the last few decades. While some people see this as a positive trend which raises the general level of education within the community, others fear that it is lowering the 78
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their was 84
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 89
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 73
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 23, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
There is the issue of whether or not the government should devote more budge...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 45, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'roads'' or 'road's'?
Suggestion: roads'; road's
...onclusion, whereas expense financial on roads infrastructure can be useful, I am of t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11295681063 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75107129767 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601328903654 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7755098305 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.384615385 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1538461538 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.76923076923 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136376992012 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0519115801331 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072355605001 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0827938727373 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101452679388 0.056905535591 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.