tpo29
Both the reading and lecture are about the dinosaurs' migration in arctic climate. Since the climate of Alaska's North Slope was harsh in one hundred million years ago; hence, the dinosaurs' population could solve its problem with such tough circumstance by migration. The reading provides three reasons for confirming of this hypothesize. The lecture casts doubt on the claims made in the article. The professor finds all reasons dubious.
First of all, the author of reading declares that this type of dinosaur has been known as edmontosaur that was feeding on plants; consequently it requires plant for surviving and it had to move to temperate areas. This point is challenged by the lecturer. She contends in that time- one hundred million years ago- the temperature of arctic was warmer than today especially in summer days and there was the sun for 24 hours in the sky. It goes without saying much more plants could grow to compensate lack of vegetables in winter and even those plants had more nutrition.
Secondly, the article claims that a great number of dinosaurs' fossils have found in a site; subsequently, they may have lived in herd and as we all know the animals that usually migrate, collect in a herd. This argument is rebutted by the lecturer. The professor believes that living in the herd always is not related to migration. Sometimes animals spend their life in a herd for protection in front of predators. The epitome of this is a modern animal is called the rozavet elk which moves in herd for such a goal.
Finally, the reading passage proposes that originally edmontosaurs had the ability of moving in long distances because such difficult migration required dinosaurs to move several kilometers for a long period of time. On the other hand, the professor expresses that this argument is valid, however, a lot of found fossils are associated with juvenile dinosaurs, as a result they could not migrate fast like adult edmontosaurs. As a matter a fact, they walked slowly and their parents had to companion them during this rigid trip.
- Tpo33 80
- tpo31 80
- Do you agree or disagree with this sentence? the teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays. 66
- Some people think that we should keep away from others to improve our relationship, because being away from people reminds us of how important they are. Others think we should always stay with others to have good relationship because we can communicate wi 40
- tpo37 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 44, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'dinosaurs'' or 'dinosaur's'?
Suggestion: dinosaurs'; dinosaur's
...h the reading and lecture are about the dinosaurs migration in arctic climate. Since the ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'dinosaurs'' or 'dinosaur's'?
Suggestion: dinosaurs'; dinosaur's
...e hundred million years ago; hence, the dinosaurs population could solve its problem with...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 397, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...oubt on the claims made in the article. The professor finds all reasons dubious. ...
^^^
Line 7, column 202, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...s to move several kilometers for a long period of time. On the other hand, the professor expre...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 30.3222958057 152% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1721.0 1373.03311258 125% => OK
No of words: 347.0 270.72406181 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95965417867 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60996794288 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 145.348785872 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567723342939 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 419.366225166 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.4225346892 49.2860985944 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.235294118 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4117647059 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41176470588 7.06452816374 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3745131284 0.272083759551 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0913383597958 0.0996497079465 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646770040442 0.0662205650399 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197384183192 0.162205337803 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0104339342793 0.0443174109184 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 63.6247240618 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.