The best way for governments to solve the problem of traffic congestion is providing free public transport in 24 hours per day, and seven days a week. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recent decades have witnessed a substantial increase in the volume of traffic congestion, especially in metropolitan areas, forcing governments to undertake many initiatives to reduce this problem. Although the proposal of free public transport all day appears reasonable, I believe that there are more practical measures to tackle this social issue.
There are a multitude of drawbacks related to traffic jam when it comes to public transportation. First, In some developing nations, public transportation is invarably asssociated with irregularity and exorbitant services. This will incentivise citizens to use their own private vehicles to save money, which obviously increases gridlock. Second, Some individuals could be susceptible to physical or sexual violence or mugging when using public vehicles. In fact many teenagers in India have become the victims of sexual attack or abduction by bus drivers while they are going on the bus on their own.
However, there are many potential solutions to minimize public congestion rather than providing free public transportation all day. First, capital investments on the installation of super highways and bridges should be conducted by government. In fact, This will lead to the dispersal in the number of both public and private vehicles, reducing remarkably the traffic jam rate. Second, offical authorities should encourage the usage of bicycles in citizens. This not only prevents traffic congestion but also the emission of exhausted fumes as well.
In conclusion, I believe that public transport is unrealistic in terms of reducing gridlock. Some initiatives such as road construction and usage of bikes are proved to eliminate this problem effectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-01 | phuongnguyen01 | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-24 | Manpreet aujla | 56 | view |
| 2019-02-15 | PhuongLee | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-02 | hongthuy | 56 | view |
| 2018-09-21 | Tran Xuan Quoc | 84 | view |
- The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000. 78
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Unemployment is a growing problem all over the world. What are the causes of this ? What could be done to help tackle this issue? 78
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female study in every subject.Do you agree or disagree? 56
- Long distance flight uses more fuel than cars and brings pollution to the environment We should discourage non essential flight rather than limit the use of cars To what extent do you agree or disagree 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, second, so, well, while, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1466.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68217054264 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06314374269 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.624031007752 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.2379401268 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.714285714 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4285714286 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92857142857 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176020303036 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058922666809 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627682355346 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108263952589 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0465330851624 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.4 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.