Do you agree or disagree? Two people can still become good friends if one of them has more money than the other one does.
The question is whether two persons would remain as friends even if one of them has much more money compared with other one or not. Everyone with regard to his private view point can maintain a specific direction toward this statement; however, in my opinion, it will be impossible to continue such an incompatible friendship. I feel this way for some reasons, which I will explore them to empower my vantage point in following essay:
To begin with, it is an undeniable fact that in such a hectic life, people look for someone to accompany them in happiness and troubles; hence, making new friend requires some special conditions such as being at the same age, having equal circumstance of social, familial and economical and list goes on. When two friends are not at the same economic position, some serious problems will burgeon between them because the type of their entertainments can be different. To elucidate, take my own experience. In the first day of university, I could get familiar with a girl who her father had a well-known company. At first, both of us were satisfied from our relationship; however, as the time was passing, we perceived that our perspective to life was totally diverse. For instance, she liked to expend her money for luxury things or eating in the most expensive restaurants, so there was not even a common point among us and this plight could make us disappointed to pursue our friendship.
The second reason for my advocate lies the reality that the most crucial part of human beings' life is their priorities which can form the human's route to future. Everyone starts walking and planning a schedule based on his goals. One has to save money for rainy days and another has to study hard for achieving breakthrough. One should accept that friends have to be able to assist humans in this way or at least not to disrupt them. Another example from that same mentioned situation above was that in a summer I made a decision to go abroad and stay in a family's house. The most main purpose of this was the knowing a new culture. That wealthy girl asked me to accompany me in this trip and my permission was the most wrong decision in the history. After arriving there, she started complaining about the being small of rooms, not having a comfort feeling with her bed and so on. Finally, she moved on a hotel and our relationship cut forever. Nevertheless, I could get the most precious lesson in my living.
In conclusion, I believe that in an unequal economic position, the overwhelming majority of friendships will fail because there will not be common interests that two sides would be able to share them with each other.
- tpo25 86
- Tpo12 83
- Do you agree or disagree with this sentence? the teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays. 66
- do you agree or disagree? life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children. 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future. 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 88, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
...ity that the most crucial part of human beings life is their priorities which can form...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, hence, however, if, look, nevertheless, second, so, well, as to, at least, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, to begin with, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2205.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 464.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75215517241 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64119157421 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64575745551 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553879310345 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 686.7 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.0748419371 48.9658058833 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.052631579 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4210526316 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.52631578947 5.45110844103 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143613587995 0.236089414692 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0446772955403 0.076458572812 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0777493340901 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0991342592483 0.150856017488 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521880585043 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.