Tpo15
Both of the reading and lecture are about the cane toad. This species is applied in Australia in 1935 for protecting farmers' products in cope with harmful insects. However, now the extreme growth of the cane toad cannot be stopped. The reading provides three methods to be prevented from the spread of the cane toad. The lecturer casts doubts on the claims made in the article and finds all arguments dubious.
First of all, the author of reading declares that constructing a national fence can be more effective in this way because this approach have already used for the population of rabbits and it was successful. This point is challenged by the professor. She claims that the cane toads' eggs and even young can toads would find in the rivers and streams; consequently, building a fence will not be practical because the stream of water is able to transfer this species to other areas.
Secondly, the article contends that government should create a campaign of volunteers; therefore, these people can catch the young cane toad with hand and also can destroy the mentioned species’ eggs; in the contrast, the professor claims that untrained volunteers may create the worse condition and even they can harm other species. She elaborates on this by mentioning that it is very formidable for untrained volunteers to discern a frog from the cane toad particularly when the cane toad is young.
Finally, the reading passage states that introducing a virus can manage the cane toad's population. The aforementioned virus will not harm to reptile and amphibian which have been infected and it just destroys the cane toad. This argument is rebutted by the lecturer. She expresses that Australian reptiles and amphibians are usually transferred to other countries like America; subsequently, when these species enter to The United State, they will harm to Native American cane toads that are crucial species in the American wild, so this approach can create negative impacts on ecosystem.
- which one do you prefer? high-school students should take different subjects at the same time or they should focus on three or four subjects at the time. 90
- TPO15 80
- do you agree or disagree?it is better to travel abroad to visit different countries when you are young than old. 76
- do you agree or disagree? it is better to relax by reading a book or watching TV than doing exercise. 85
- Tpo42 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, however, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1674.0 1373.03311258 122% => OK
No of words: 327.0 270.72406181 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11926605505 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66669472252 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 145.348785872 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529051987768 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 419.366225166 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 1.0 0.116997792494 855% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 94.4889854287 49.2860985944 192% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.571428571 110.228320801 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3571428571 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 7.06452816374 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.537813130257 0.272083759551 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.193157020453 0.0996497079465 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117212585693 0.0662205650399 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.333502014311 0.162205337803 206% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404317117773 0.0443174109184 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.3589403974 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.