The charts below give information on the ages of populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, an make comparisions where relevant.
The pie charts provide data about the ages of population in both Italy and Yemen in 2000 as well as a prediction for these country for 2050.
In general, it can be seen that Yemen had the youngest population in 2000 and it is predicted the same for the year 2050. The proportion of elderly people is predicted to increase in both countries over the 50 years period.
In 2000, just over half of the population of Yemen were under 14 years, compared to just under 15% of italian in the same age group. Only a small percentage of inhabitants in Yemen were over 60 at 3.6%, whereas in Italy the proportion of people over 60 were sligthly higher compared to that of Yemen at 14.3%. In 2000, people aged between 15-59 years represented 46.6% and 61.6% of the total population in Yemen and in Italy respectively.
It is forecast that the youngest group will decrease marginally to 37% in Yemen and to 11.5% in Italy in 2050. Projections also show that there will be an increase in the number of people over 60 years, with 42,3% and 5,7% in Yemen and Italy correspondingly.
- The table below shows the proportion of income spent on 4 common items in the UK in 1998 76
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 89
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 89
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 89
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 75, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the ages of population in both Italy and Yemen in 2000 as well as a prediction fo...
^^
Line 3, column 66, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n that Yemen had the youngest population in 2000 and it is predicted the same for...
^^
Line 5, column 19, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e 50 years period. In 2000, just over half of the population of Yemen were und...
^^
Line 5, column 380, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 15-59 years represented 46.6% and 61.6% of the total population in Yemen and in ...
^^
Line 5, column 421, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of the total population in Yemen and in Italy respectively. It is forecast that...
^^
Line 6, column 74, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...group will decrease marginally to 37% in Yemen and to 11.5% in Italy in 2050. Pro...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, well, whereas, in general, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 881.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5412371134 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56303774923 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479381443299 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.6387239688 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.125 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232456407948 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11619563041 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0718809994783 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160108313561 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0595058514872 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.