A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
A nation relies on its schools to engender the leaders of tomorrow. Adopting a common national curriculum can bring the youth of a country in unison. An ideal curriculum should reflect what a nation wants its future leaders and citizens to know about its history, accomplishments and the challenges in the way ahead.
A national curriculum exposes students to the history of their nation, providing them with a holistic view of their cultural, economical, social and technological evolution, rather than promoting a provincial view circumscribed to their respective states. Students learn to appreciate the fact that their state(or local region) has evolved out of an agglomeration of states, which forms a nation, and is still contingent upon other member states for its progress in various spheres.
An identical national curriculum will persuade students to ponder on the problems of national importance, as they will learn to recognize themselves as a part of the whole. An instance emphasizing the importance of having a hawk-eye view on national problems is the current state of drug abuse in West Virginia. If we have a chapter on the perils of drug abuse and have the current state of West Virginia as a case study in the syllabus of schools in say New York, it will prompt students to come up with different experiments and solutions to eradicate this problem, even if this problem has no bearings on the New Yorkers.
When students across states share common information base, it ameliorates the plausibility of inter-state discourses of national interests during their childhood itself. The nation need not wait for their students to reach a maturity level for them to appreciate the value of national interests over that of their own state or province etc. For example, with a national curriculum in place, students from different states can participate in debate competitions with topics germane to the nation and not just their states or immediate neighbors.
Looking at the view of a common national curriculum in terms of convenience, it is common for students to migrate from one state to another due to personal reasons like their parents switching jobs etc. In such cases, having a common curriculum makes this transition easier for students as they do not find themselves completely alien to what is been taught in their new school. For example, India is known for its diversity in various spheres, and education sector is not untouched by this either. There are several education boards prescribing curriculum with little or no overlaps among one another. A student whose father has changed job or has been transferred from say Andhra Pradesh to Maharashtra, has to virtually start from scratch, aligning herself with the new curriculum, and an almost little to no overlap among those state board curriculum, leaves this goal an arduous one to accomplish.
On a bigger scale, fostering of the often pernicious regional politics and strong predilections of administrative officers, ministers and decision makers, in general, to benefit their states, while they are in power, is often the result of their provincial mindset, fomented by their early education. A national curriculum has the potential to subdue the development of these regional prejudices in the minds of students during their formative years. A common national curriculum will channel students to an unprejudiced path, with students viewing entire nation as their own, rather than developing affinity towards the welfare of their home state or region etc.
However, my advocacy on a common national curriculum should not be construed as disregarding the interests of individual students. My view does not discourage establishing special interest groups in schools focusing on different extracurricular, academic activities or even engaging in discussions on regional issues.
I would proffer that, schools(and the nation in general) should adopt a liberal view of informing students about their national history, current challenges, etc by adopting a nation-wide curriculum, but should not balk students from pursuing their special interests.
- "On Balmer Island, where mopeds serve as a popular form of transportation, the population increases to 100,000 during the summer months. To reduce the number of accidents involving mopeds and pedestrians, the town council of Balmer Island should limit the 66
- The following appeared as a letter to the editor from a Central Plaza store owner."Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Central 66
- In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 75
- The following appeared in a letter from a homeowner to a friend."Of the two leading real estate firms in our town—Adams Realty and Fitch Realty—Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom 66
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, regarding, so, still, while, as to, for example, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 49.0 33.0505617978 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 105.0 58.6224719101 179% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3493.0 2235.4752809 156% => OK
No of words: 653.0 442.535393258 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34915773354 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.05508305356 4.55969084622 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94428723913 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 317.0 215.323595506 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485451761103 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 1079.1 704.065955056 153% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.3475627983 60.3974514979 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.772727273 118.986275619 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6818181818 23.4991977007 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77272727273 5.21951772744 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.97078651685 161% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241264061716 0.243740707755 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0910936965598 0.0831039109588 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425137201085 0.0758088955206 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131733169005 0.150359130593 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317421119453 0.0667264976115 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 14.1392134831 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 48.8420337079 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.1743820225 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 179.0 100.480337079 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.