Some people think a job not only provides income but also social life. Others think it is better to develop social life with people you do not work with. Discuss both views and give your opinion
People having differing views with regard to the topic of social life in work environment. Some people hold the opinion that there are many advantages to being sociable outside of workplaces, whereas others consider that it is better to socialize with co-workers. This essay will discuss both points of view and give the writer’s opinion that social interaction with colleagues should be promoted.
Although it is not my opinion, many people suggest that they prefer to get together with someone who they do not work with because of some reasons. To begin, one of the main reasons is that these people want to keep professionalism in their works. They are afraid that their work-related decisions could be influenced if they have a close relationship with their colleagues. A particular example is when they have to fire a staff who is their close friends, and this could be an extremely difficult task which they might not be able to complete. In addition to professionalism, gaining more opportunities in both life and work could be another explanation. When people socialize with friends working in different areas, they could have information and connections which could be a fundamental factor for their future success. This could be true to business people because their career development possibly increases together with the size of their social network. Hence, people should have social life outside their office.
Despite above considerations, I do not believe that this opinion stands up to scrutiny, and would agree with people having an advocate on socializing with colleagues. Firstly and most importantly, job satisfaction could be achieved. When people have social interactions with their co-workers, they could build up strong connections which are vitally important to teamwork performance. As a result of these connections, workers could accomplish difficult jobs, and in turn receive promotions and other benefits. Worldwide companies such as Google or Facebook understand this crucial point, and they have promoted team building programmes and requested all of their staffs to join company events. Not only do people expect job satisfactions, but they also want to search for long-term relationships. In Vietnam where people devote their entire life to work in one company, they have a tendency to turn colleagueship into a permanently close relationship. It is considered a perfectly wise choice because co-workers are the one they spend most of their time with after getting retired. Thus, people should enjoy having time with workmates outside workplaces.
To sum up, although some people recommend socializing outside of the office, I would argue that there is sufficient evidence to demonstrate that this is not the case. Having social life with workmates brings about job satisfactions and long-term relationships.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-23 | Manh1003 | 73 | view |
| 2020-05-04 | thenaolayeu112 | 84 | view |
| 2019-06-15 | Lê Võ Nhật Quang | 67 | view |
| 2019-02-16 | yaldaasgari | 67 | view |
| 2019-02-16 | yaldaasgari | 67 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, so, thus, whereas, in addition, such as, as a result, to sum up, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 47.0 24.0651302605 195% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2410.0 1615.20841683 149% => OK
No of words: 446.0 315.596192385 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40358744395 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96795950228 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511210762332 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 729.9 506.74238477 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.384769539078 520% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5241910099 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.545454545 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2727272727 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.31818181818 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 8.67935871743 196% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341939072764 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127391189398 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0846593751666 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267744300327 0.151304729494 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0866061150537 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.