The fast food industry has negative effects on our health, the environment and family eating habits. Do you agree or disagree?
The discussion on fast food is a debatable one, and each side has its logical arguments. I believe that consuming fast food leads to have more negative results on the society and human life than positive. In this essay, I shall explain my point of view by analyzing both sides of the argument.
On the one hand, critics may point out that one of the most significant benefits of taking fast food is consuming less hours to prepare and simple. For example, if we are cooking instant noodles bit more easier than preparing vegetable rice. The women who are going for job could easily prepared this dish in the early morning for their children and husband. The pressure to focus on varieties of cuisine became low.
On the other hand, in spite of these arguments, consuming lot of fast food has negative consequences in various ways. Firstly, the deficiency of vitamins, minerals and other constituents are getting low by taking these fast food. They would be very weak and less immunity to sustain in this world. Secondly, it leads to many biological changes of cells in the human body which leads to cancer and many vulnerable disease.
Lastly, in my opinion, the in taking of fast food should be reduced in our daily life.
Taking these points into consideration, from a personal perspective, without a shadow of a doubt, I conclude that improving the fresh vegetable, fruits and natural process food should be taken by the human beings to prolong and healthier life in this world.
- Write a letter to the Information Officer at the TAPE Information Office asking for information about the Tertiary Preparation Certificate Describe your educational background and your reasons for wanting to do the course 84
- Today more people are travelling than ever before. Why is this the case? What are the benefits of travelling for the traveler? 73
- Some languages are increasingly spoken in different countries while the usage of others is rapidly declining Is this a positive or a negative development 92
- You have just spent a week with a friend on holiday. When you got home, you realized you had left your wallet there.Write a letter to your friend. In your letter.-Thank you friend for the holiday-Explain that you left your wallet in their house-Give them 78
- Does e learning have a prosperous future if yes why if not why not 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 115, Rule ID: LESS_DOLLARSMINUTESHOURS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer hours'?
Suggestion: fewer hours
...nefits of taking fast food is consuming less hours to prepare and simple. For example, if ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 115, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun hours is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...nefits of taking fast food is consuming less hours to prepare and simple. For exampl...
^^^^
Line 2, column 199, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
..., if we are cooking instant noodles bit more easier than preparing vegetable rice. The wome...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 287, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'prepare'
Suggestion: prepare
...omen who are going for job could easily prepared this dish in the early morning for thei...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, for example, in my opinion, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1230.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 256.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8046875 5.00649968141 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52554091901 2.71678728327 93% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 139.433497537 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59375 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 379.143842365 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.325123152709 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.761240506 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6153846154 104.977214359 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6923076923 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.69230769231 7.25397266985 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 2.75862068966 290% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125158125583 0.242375264174 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0479621806828 0.0925447433944 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510992131268 0.071462118173 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.078024006765 0.151781067708 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419852457742 0.0609392437508 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 12.6369458128 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.1260098522 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.5310837438 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.32886699507 99% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 55.0591133005 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.