You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The bar chart shows the scores of teams A, B and C over four different seasons.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart compares three different groups in term of the points per 4-year period from 2002 to 2005.
Overall, it is evident that the scores of all teams fluctuated during the period shown. In addition, the points scored by team B were always far higher than the scores of the other groups.
In 2002, team B achieved the highest scores, at 82 points. By contrast, there were infinite low scores for team A and team C, with 5 points and 10 points respectively. The 4-year periodsaw a dramatic rise in the scores of team A, reaching 35 points in 2004. The totals of team C stayed relatively stable at from 10 to 15 points. Whereas the scores for team B decreased gradually from a peak in 2002 to a low of 43 points in 2004.
There was a slightly increase in the points of team B in 2005 with 55 points, while team A witnessed a fall in its scores to 8 points, compared with 5 points for team C.
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USAsince 1980 with projections until 2030 73
- Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. 73
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The bar chart shows the scores of teams A, B and C over four different seasons.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 11, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
... a low of 43 points in 2004. There was a slightly increase in the points of team B in 2005 with 55...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 726.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.27058823529 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38942306019 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 190.8 283.868780488 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.1 1.45097560976 76% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.3236516009 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.6666666667 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117342550905 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0609913636309 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0173145499962 0.0843802449381 21% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0804544398627 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0173513388304 0.0819641961636 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.1 13.2329268293 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 95.5 61.2550243902 156% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.4 10.3012195122 43% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.49 11.4140731707 66% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.04 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.