Should a city try to preserve its old, historic buildings or destroy them and replace with modern buildings? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
When preserving old, historic buildings in a city comes up, some people are agree with destroying and replacing them with modern buildings but I completely believe that old buildings should maintain in every city. There are two points in support of my viewpoint that are discussed in following passage.
First, historic buildings bring a lot of money into a city by attracting tourists from other parts on the world. Tourists come to a city in order to visit old buildings. They must pay money for accommodation, transporting from one place to another place, food and so forth. In addition if new restaurants and shopping centers are build next to historic places, we could sell them souvenirs and new products of our city. Consequently, economic growth will be improved.
Second, historic building would bring more fun to urban areas due to they have been built with special interesting designs which young architects could apply in modern architecture. In this case, diversity is retain. I could show you why maintaining of these kinds of building is necessary. For example, I live in a place where many of building are the same in appearance which cause people feel depressed and they want young architects to perform new styles in designing new buildings.
Third, beyond a shadow of doubt, old places show both how our ancestor lived and what cultures they had. But when these worthwhile buildings are destroyed, we do not have anything to give our next generations. For improving culture it is crucial to know about culture of previous generations.
All above evidence supports this undeniable fact that every society needs its historic buildings, although every things chances overtime. But on day these modern life will become old-fashion for next generation and replaced with novel things but only its culture and buildings will be remained. Because of it, I completely believe that this awesome old building for expanding our knowledge must be preserved.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-09 | Nikolin | 76 | view |
| 2017-06-26 | nana-pa.par70 | 76 | view |
- Some students prefer to live on campus in a dormitory. Others prefer to live in an apartment or house off campus. Which do you prefer? 70
- Teachers are responsible for motivating students to learn. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use specific reasons and examples to suppo 70
- TPO-24 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?One of the best ways that parents can help their teenage children prepare for adult life is to encourage them to take a part-time job.Use specific reasons and examples 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Technology has made the world a better place to live. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 77, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...ngs in a city comes up, some people are agree with destroying and replacing them with...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 277, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...to another place, food and so forth. In addition if new restaurants and shopping centers...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 209, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'retained'.
Suggestion: retained
...rchitecture. In this case, diversity is retain. I could show you why maintaining of th...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, second, so, third, while, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1649.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 321.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13707165109 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73798636351 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598130841121 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7425899961 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8823529412 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.70588235294 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320924974724 0.236089414692 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0902240606462 0.076458572812 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107395165351 0.0737576698707 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190169905214 0.150856017488 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13313464632 0.0645574589148 206% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.