The chart below shows possible causes and results of ‘urban drift’, where large numbers of people move from rural to urban areas.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The flow chart below explains information of possible causes and results of urbanization, when numerous numbers of people immigrate to urban areas.
Overall, the immigration to busy main city results many problems for populations.
Based on the flow chart, there are two main problems as a result in moving to urban area. The first one is poor harvest, which happens because use of fossil fuels is increasing more and more. This is a big responsibility as a cause of climate change, which materially affects to harvest. The following problem is lofty expectations from villagers, who think that they could earn more money when living in city. Also, the idea of getting better way of life has influenced these indigenous inhabitants to leave their local community.
Because of native populations’ rapid movement towards rust belt city, many issues raise in urban area, such as idleness, congestion, homelessness, and misspent youth booms. These bring issues: health and social problems, which people find in the city.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-12-30 | Dhani Aristya | 63 | view |
| 2013-10-19 | eddysuaib | 84 | view |
- Mobile phone owner growth 58
- In some countries it is usual for young people who graduate from high school to spend a year working or travelling before going to university What are the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this 83
- The chart below gives information about global sales of game software, CDs and DVD/Video or Video. Write a report for a university lecture describing the information.-Syerapke- (rewrite) 60
- In recent years, people watch more movies from overseas? What are the reasons for this? Should the government give financial support to local cinema to produce local films? 80
- The number of telephone call in the UK from 1995 to 2002 60
flaws:
Sentence Length SD: 3.871 7.5
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.043 0.07
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 10
No. of Words: 163 200
No. of Characters: 827 1000
No. of Different Words: 112 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.573 4.0
Average Word Length: 5.074 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.634 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 55 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 41 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 27 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 18 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.111 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 3.871 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.444 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.381 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.639 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.043 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4