should government spend more money on improving roads or improving public transportation?
Nobody doubt that, nowadays, improving of roads and public transportation is crucial. And government should allocate some money on improving both. Some people believe that government should spend more money on making roads better, to decrease crashes and collisions. However, others believe that improving and increasing public transportation is more essential than improving roads and highways and government should spend more money in this manner. I, personally, agree with the latter idea since any people with any financial level can use public transportation and also using public transportation effectively affects on our environment. In what follows I will cogently pinpoint my most conspicuous reasons to justify my point of view.
First, as we know government is responsible for the ensuring well-being of all the people. And public transportations are accessible vehicles for everybody. And even individuals with low financial level can use it, actually it is affordable for everyone due to its low cost. Spending money on improving public transportation led to make facilities for all individuals with different levels of finance.
These days the cost of living in cities, especially big cities, is huge. Using public transportations can reduce some of these costs. People could move to different parts of town by spending a little money on public transportations. So they can save their money by using public transports.
Finally, to reduce the air pollution, public transport is a good choice. Transport machines those use fuels in their engines, releases dangerous gases like carbon dioxide into air and causes many respiratory disease, by using public transport the number of machines in the roads and cities reduced and it helps to lessen the air pollution.
To make story short, public transports provide many facilities for people and using them instead of individual machines led to have more clear air. All aforementioned reasons point to my idea. I hope everybody use public vehicles in near future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dy use public vehicles in near future.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, finally, first, however, if, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1714.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 315.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44126984127 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00253693019 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539682539683 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.7798899415 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2105263158 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5789473684 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.78947368421 5.45110844103 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.48293935546 0.236089414692 205% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159475654997 0.076458572812 209% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.163312821948 0.0737576698707 221% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242527385934 0.150856017488 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.189235988822 0.0645574589148 293% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 58.1214874552 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.