The line chart compares changes in the number of incidents happened in burglary, car theft and robbery crime between 2003 to 2012 in Newport city.
The line chart compares changes in the number of incidents happened in burglary, car theft and robbery crime between 2003 to 2012 in Newport city.
It is clear that the numbers of incidents in robbery and car theft crime remained stable during the period research. Additonal, while the figure for burglary experienced the most dramatic change from 2003 to 2012.
In 2003, there were nearly 3500 incidents in burglary crime, which was highest, while the figure for car theft crime was a bit lower , at about 2800 incidents. Meanwhile, slightly more than 600 incidents happened in robbery crime. In 2008, the number of incidents in burglary and robbery crime gradually fell and reached the lowest points of over 1000 and at 500 incidents respectively, while car theft’s figure stood at over 2000 incidents.
In 2012, there was a dramatic drop in the number of burglary incidents of 2000 incidents to nearly 1000 incidents. At the same time, the figures for cart theft and robbery almost were the same at the beginning time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-07-03 | IVANTRUONG | 73 | view |
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their time. Do the advantages of this outweigh disadvantages? 67
- Education for young people is important in many countries. However, the others think government should spend more money for education in adult population who can not read and write.To what extent do you agree or disagree? - 3 78
- Oil Production Capacity 67
- How an island changed after facilities was built for tourism 78
- The graph below shows the percentage of Australian exports to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 133, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...gure for car theft crime was a bit lower , at about 2800 incidents. Meanwhile, sli...
^^
Line 4, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of burglary incidents of 2000 incidents to nearly 1000 incidents. At the same ti...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 859.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99418604651 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49955724637 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511627906977 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3274069014 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.375 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.625 5.23603664747 12% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.514750067774 0.215688989381 239% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.267670594547 0.103423049105 259% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.282556209651 0.0843802449381 335% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.424092624616 0.15604864568 272% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.33689144616 0.0819641961636 411% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.16 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.