Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated.
The author states that technology is making our lives more complicated than easy. I dont agree that it is true.
It starts from the era of Industrial Revolution when technology came into frame of our lives. From then, Industrial revolution has transformed our lives and made it easier than ever. With the help of technological changes we are able to live more simply as we can connect to our dear ones in seconds if we miss them, and we are away. The thinking ability of younger generation in our society is increasing day by day as science has taken an important role in revolutionising our lives by addition of technology and giving useful products in our hands for daily use.
Nevertheless, our parent's generation do feel that technology has break our families and dear people apart - kids are all the time on social media to increase their networking and contacts, forgetting the fact that they need to meet people in personal to know anyone rather liking any post on their profile on social site. However, this technology is the one which is bringing a change and helping us live more easily. Taking an example from a recent survey - it is found that the blood of umbical cord can be used to cure many diseases like cancer, HIV and many more. This has been proven through technology only and it is scientists who are able ot think beyond given data. Technology should work and people are to think, hence their thinking ability is elevating exponentially.
Despite of the fact that we live in a mundane lifestyle - get up every morning, check tweets, scroll instragram, see facebook, go to work - however, we can only change our lifestyle by using the technology judiously and making a fruitful use out of it.
I would like to conclude that nonetheless technology has made our lives easier, it is not true that it has made our lives complicated therfore, after a technological revolution, people have started thinking critically and analyitcally for their future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | Siddiqur Rahman | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | phajaygv | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | Evil-wasp | 75 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | raolitesh@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2019-09-29 | xipaheje | 16 | view |
- Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society. 50
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 33
- The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University:A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for thei 33
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 85, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...our lives more complicated than easy. I dont agree that it is true. It starts fro...
^^^^
Line 3, column 459, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s science has taken an important role in revolutionising our lives by addition of...
^^
Line 5, column 274, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'anyone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'likes'.
Suggestion: likes
...eople in personal to know anyone rather liking any post on their profile on social sit...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 651, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (ot) must be used with a third-person verb: 'thinks'.
Suggestion: thinks
...ly and it is scientists who are able ot think beyond given data. Technology should wo...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, so, then, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1639.0 2235.4752809 73% => OK
No of words: 337.0 442.535393258 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86350148368 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.732599723 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563798219585 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.3646726081 60.3974514979 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.076923077 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9230769231 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76923076923 5.21951772744 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258244044103 0.243740707755 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101103210456 0.0831039109588 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722549607437 0.0758088955206 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168662375712 0.150359130593 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054408661799 0.0667264976115 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.