Long distance flight uses more fuel than cars and brings pollution to the environment. We should discourage non-essential flight rather than limit the use of cars. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In recent decades, global warming has been attracting a great deal of public attention due to its substantial impacts on humankind. Although the proposal of limiting unnecessary flights appears reasonable, car restriction is more practical and effective.
On the one hand, There are many problems associated when it comes to discouraging non-essential flights. First, traveling by planes is one of the most convenient and fastest ways to travel from one location to another. Restricting flights means that citizens have to use other alternative vehicles such as cars or trains which require remarkable physical travels, costing unnecessary time, money and effort. Second, air travel restriction is conducive to a reduction in foreign tourism. This suggests a causal relationship with a decrease in national incomes of many countries especially those depends heavily on tourism as the main source of national revenues.
On the other hand, it is true that limitation of cars is more practical than flights. First, an upward pattern could be witnessed in car numbers while plane numbers remain stable in many countries especially the developing ones. It is implied that reducing car usage would diminish more carbon dioxide and monoxide concentrations than reducing flights, contributing considerably to the environmental rehabilitation. Besides, Citizens can also switch to public vehicles such as underground trains or buses for environmental efficiency. This is because public transportation is invariably associated with a lower degree of fossil fuel consumption, which is proved to be the main source of exhausted fumes in the atmosphere.
In conclusion, limiting unnecessary flights could culminate in some negative consequences related to foreign tourism and travel comfort. Official authorities worldwide should meet and together undertake the most effective initiatives to guarantee the long-term sustainability of the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-10-22 | sherin rijo | 87 | view |
- Some people think that university students should only study one special subject. Othersthink that universities should encourage students to study a range of subjects in addition to aspecial area. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. 61
- As life expectancy is increasing, people work after retirement with pay. Alternatively, some people start to work at a young age. Are these positive or negative impacts? 93
- Long distance flight uses more fuel than cars and brings pollution to the environment. We should discourage non-essential flight rather than limit the use of cars. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- Some people think that killing animals for food is cruel, but others claim that animals are a necessary part of a diet. What is your opinion. 61
- Some people do not go directly to college but travel or work for a short time. Do you think it has more advantages or disadvantages? 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, second, so, while, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1663.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.81468531469 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20909121386 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618881118881 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5671971092 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.785714286 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187843619965 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589117353722 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560931777554 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101707637865 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0175518122863 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.37 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.