The graph compares employment rates in three sectors of the economy, in the UK, 2000-2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph highlights data about the proportion of people who were employed in three economic sectors in the UK, over a decade between 2000 and 2010.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that there were significant upward trends in the figures for public and self-employment sectors, while private area underwent a dramatic decline over the period in question. Another interesting point is that, in 2000, private sector had the highest employment rate among all, but the figure for public sector was higher than those for the others in 2010.
Looking at details, as regards public sector, the percentage started at nearly 40% in 2000. Having remained stable in the first three years, it then went up sharply to just under 50% in 2005. Following that, there was a remarkable decrease by around 5%, but the proportion soon recovered in the next year. Finally, the figure went through a consistent rise to approximately 52%, reaching its all-time high. The same overall trend was applied for self-employment area. Having fluctuated around 20%, the proportion then rocketed to about 28% in 2008. Subsequently, it kept leveling off at 30% until 2010.
By contrast, the percentage of private sector went in opposite direction. It decreased considerably from around 48% to just over 40% in 2002. Despite stabilizing the next year, it then fell steadily over the second half of the period to hit its trough of 20% in 2010.
- The graph compares employment rates in three sectors of the economy in the UK 2000 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 86
- The pictures below show how tomato ketchup is made Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 77
- The graph shows predictions about the number of people who will study three major world languages between 2020 and 2030 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- The graph below shows the changing patterns of access to modern technology in homes in the UK expresses in percentage terms Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- Table, The number of travellers using three major British airports. 35
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, look, second, so, then, while, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.48453608247 94% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 5.05154639175 79% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.03092783505 132% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 32.9175257732 30% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 26.3917525773 186% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.85567010309 207% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1193.0 937.175257732 127% => OK
No of words: 237.0 206.0 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03375527426 4.54256449028 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.78020617076 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67819172689 2.54303337028 105% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 127.690721649 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611814345992 0.622605031667 98% => OK
syllable_count: 341.1 290.88556701 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.13402061856 44% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.360824742268 277% => OK
Article: 6.0 0.824742268041 728% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.463917525773 431% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6804123711 103% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 16.3608247423 110% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.587323364 44.8134815571 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7692307692 76.5299724578 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2307692308 16.8248392259 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07692307692 4.34317383033 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.94845360825 203% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158799260722 0.216113520407 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0518857238436 0.0766984524023 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636097978952 0.0603063233224 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11484356955 0.12726935374 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729993542231 0.0580467560999 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 8.37731958763 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 70.7449484536 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 7.45979381443 106% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 8.71597938144 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 7.59969072165 110% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 41.2886597938 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 8.62886597938 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 8.54432989691 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 8.15463917526 147% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.