Tpo6
Both the reading and lecture are about Great houses which have been discovered in Chaco Canyon in the New Mexico in the American Southwest. The reading provides three reasons for the purposes of using these massive stone buildings and then supports them. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the article and finds all arguments dubious.
Firstly, the author of reading declares that since these mentioned buildings are similar to the architecture of Apartment buildings at New Mexico which are used by ordinary people; consequently, Great houses were residential. This point is challenged by the lecturer. He points out that there is a similarity between outside of Great houses with the Apartment buildings, however, inside of Great houses is very different. He elaborates on this by mentioning that there were a few fireplaces- rather ten fireplaces- which could not support one -hundred people's needs.
Secondly, the article contends that there is a possibility that Great houses were employed for storing maze which was the main source of food in this area; in the contrast, the lecturer claims that even a maze did not found on the floor and also archaeologists could not obtain any trace of maze or a large container related to storing maze.
Finally, the reading passage states that a mound discovered near one of these Great houses with a large number of pots; hence, the reading offers that these buildings may have applied as a ceremonial center that native people were gathering and eating foods in these rituals . This argument is rebutted by the professor again. The lecturer expresses that this mound except pots included other materials particularly constructions materials like sand, stone and even tools; subsequently, this mound may have been just a trash and meanwhile, pots may have belonged to construction workers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-15 | YasamanEsml | 76 | view |
| 2023-08-03 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 76 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 85 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 76 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 3 | view |
- do you agree or disagree?? the young people should try different jobs before they decide which job or career they will choose in the long term. 83
- Do you agree or disagree?successful people try new things and take risk than only doing what they already know how to do well. 82
- tpo34 70
- tpo9 3
- Tpo45 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ce these mentioned buildings are similar to the architecture of Apartment buildin...
^^
Line 8, column 97, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...red near one of these Great houses with a large number of pots; hence, the reading offers that th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 275, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...hering and eating foods in these rituals . This argument is rebutted by the profes...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1560.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 299.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21739130435 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67927021573 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548494983278 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 92.5301827013 49.2860985944 188% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.818181818 110.228320801 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1818181818 21.698381199 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.81818181818 7.06452816374 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.3589403974 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.8541721854 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.