Recycled products are considered a safe way to save the environment. However, there are many agruments that recycling process often releases low quality outcome. Discuss both views and state your opinion.
It is thought by some people that reprocessing of waste to recover reusable materials often emits low quality consequences. However, I agree with the idea that products made from recycled goods are considered a safe way to protect the environment.
To begin with, there are a variety of reasons why the recycling process releases outcome which do not have quality enough. First and foremost, recycled products is not high-quality in many cases. For example, almost kins of products made frome trashes which is collected in rubbish dump. As a result, unless the process is carefull, products will not be durable and useful when consumers use it. In addition, workers in recycling factories could be forced to work in poor working conditions. As a matter of fact that the recycling sites are always unhealthy and unsafe, because it has a great number of garbage which is needed to recycle. Moreover, the workers could be dangerous because of the harmful chemicals from these wastes.
On the other hand, products recycled are examined a probable way to save the environment. Firstly, it could reduce the huge number of garbage released. For instance, plastic packaging is one kind of the popular rubbish which does not break down easily. Consequently, if it is not thrown away in trashcan, it will spoil the nature beauty such as caves, beaches or oceans. Secondly, recycled products will mitigate greenhouse effect destroying the environment. To be more specific, garbage disposal would discharge carbon dioxide to the atmosphere leads to air pollution. In other words, the amount of greenhouse gases will contribute to climate change, and it will rise the global temperatures which is a main reason of global warming.
In conclusion, although some people believe that the low quality outcome is discharged frequently in the recycling process, I am convinced that the environment will be safe when individuals use the recycled products
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-07-17 | Van Luong Ngoc Thuy | 78 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of people using various form of transport in France 71
- More and more young people from wealthy countries are spending a short time doing unpaid work such as teaching or building houses for communities in poorer countries What are the reasons for this Who benefits more from this the communities or these young 79
- Nowadays, not many students are choosing to study science subject in some countries. What are reasons for their choice? What will be effects on their society? 78
- Recycled products are considered a safe way to save the environment. However, there are many arguments that recycling process often releases low quality outcome. Discuss both views and state your opinion. 78
- Most large companies nowadays operate multinationally. To what extent they have responsibility toward local communities? Should their enterprises offer help to their employees and local citizens? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a matter of fact, as a result, in many cases, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1632.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21405750799 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79206174986 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571884984026 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5528749951 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4117647059 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.7058823529 7.06120827912 208% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29485241936 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0935650484636 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0979544388801 0.0667982634062 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196776114013 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605261081769 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.