The maps belowe show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and in 2010.
Summarise the information by selectiong and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given maps compare the changes in village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010.
It can be clearly seen from the maps that the village saw a considerable increase in population aw the number of houses grew bigger. On the other hand, agriculture declined as there used to be a farmland in 1930 and in 2010 it dissapeared.
Considering the center of the village in 1930, there used to be a large house surrounded by gardens. Along the main pathway, there was just a few houses, a post office and a primary school. On the north side of the village, there was a bridge located away from the centre which allowed the citizens to cross the River Stroke. This object remained the same over a period of 80 years.
While the patway in 2010 became extended, the number of dwellings along it grew bigger at the same time. Other thing that remained the same until 2010 was a post office situated opposite of a primary school that has been enlarged. Instead of the large manor surrounded by gardens in 1930, 80 years later, the gardens were reduced and a retirement home was built.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-07-27 | verunenka68 | 78 | view |
| 2014-07-21 | drjowelynt | 87 | view |
| 2014-07-21 | Gerrard | 60 | view |
| 2014-05-13 | PhD | 60 | view |
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for differents organisations.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 84
- Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing (for example through cellphone tracking and security cameras). In many cases, the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening.Do you think the advanta 73
- Dieting can change a person s life for the better or ruin one s health completely What is your opinion 93
- The graph below describes prices of housing in Sometown in 2005. 67
- The graph below shows the population change between 1940 and 2000 in three different counties in the U.S. state of Oregon.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
well, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 882.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56994818653 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40922056707 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554404145078 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.0241882985 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.2 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14750723317 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065238001236 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0776547536338 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124112464716 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0933169200355 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.