Most large companies nowadays operate multinationally. To what extent they have responsibility toward local communities? Should their enterprises offer help to their employees and local citizens?
Is is undeniable fact that multinational companies are more and more popular in recent years. From my perspective, these business have to be responsible for local people, and the support of these companies is necessary for their worker and local inhabitants.
To begin with, there are variety of reasons why the responsibility of large companies of many nations plays a key role toward local communities. First and foremost, natural environment could be poluted by corporation when building or manufacturing. For example, running factories, disposing waste, and simply using air conditioners are main reasons which lead to the air and water pollution. Therefore, they have to take responsibility for placing restriction on the level of contaminants released to protect the local environment. In addition, paying tax on schedule is extremely a important obligation of multinational associations. If they do not obey, they will violate the national laws, and indirectly deprive benefits’ inhabitants which they are well-deserved to reap.
On the other hand, companies composed of several nationalities should help their workforce and local individuals because of following reasons. Firstly, educating for their employees could raise the quantity of their products. To be more specific, labors will work more effectively when having knowledge about the products which they manufacture and the equipment which they use on the daily basis. Secondly, those of corporation must ensure health for their wage earners by safe working conditions and paying suitable salaries for them. As a matter of fact, some dangerous problems must be avoided such as child labour, starvation wages, and unsafe working conditions.
In conclusion, the operation of multinational large companies is crucial for economical development. However, I belive that having responsibility for people living in local nations and helping then as well as workforce is significantly essential.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-08-13 | Van Luong Ngoc Thuy | 84 | view |
- Scientists agree that people are damaging their health by eating too much junk food. Some people think that the answer to this problem is to educate people. Others think education will not work. Discuss both views and state your opinion. 61
- English is becoming popular as a global language. Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages? 61
- Nowadays, not many students are choosing to study science subject in some countries. What are reasons for their choice? What will be effects on their society? 78
- The bar chart shows active participation rates in top ten sports in Canada in 1998 and 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 72
- Scientists agree that people are damaging their health by eating too much junk food Some people think that the answer to this problem is to educate people Others think education will not work Discuss both views and state your opinion 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: Is
Is is undeniable fact that multinational comp...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 582, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...on, paying tax on schedule is extremely a important obligation of multinational a...
^
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...national large companies is crucial for economical development. However, I belive that hav...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a matter of fact, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1676.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70068027211 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21275743821 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612244897959 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.8167904021 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 111.733333333 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6 7.06120827912 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283386479288 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0912285039371 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.07691725102 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178195672434 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0148380193332 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.