Solving environmental problems should be the responsibility of an international organizational rather than each national government. Do you agree or disagree?
Some people argue that environmental issues would be measured effectively by a global organization rather than every national government. I disagree with this view.
On the one hand, I advocate that every national government should be mainly responsible for dealing with environmental issues. The first reason is that the government often works with large businesses which significantly contribute to causing pollution; therefore whether the environmental problems can be done or not apparently depends on the government’s decisions. The official departments should produce strict policies to hinder the mass production of companies as well as punish strictly those which release a huge amount of exhaust into the environment without treating. Besides, the national governments could measure the environmental issues more effectively than international organizations as they have enough budget for social causes. In fact, the government draws a large amount of tax money from individuals and businesses annually in order to ensure a strong financial support when they need to cope with problems such as pollution, enhancing the water treating systems in a short period.
On the other hand, I believe that if the international organizations enjoy helping the domestic government, problems of the environment would be easily eliminated. Firstly, the global groups often are reputable, which is helpful to raise people’s awareness of the environmental protection. For example, these organizations can use their fame and representation on the media to encourage individuals to use public transportation instead of private vehicles in order to limit carbon emissions releasing to the air. In addition to, global organizations can exercise a positive fluence in the co-operation of national states when it comes to the environmental protection. As a result, different governments would promise to reduce the emissions from the manufacture and help each other with the problem of global warming.
In conclusion, I still hold the view that the national governments should be mainly responsible for protecting the environment, with a strong support of the international organizations.
- Many people think that some individuals are naturally good leader Others think that people can learn leadership skills Discuss both views 81
- An increasing number of people change their career and place of residence several times during their life time Is this positive or negative development 87
- In some countries, the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing. What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them? 78
- Space travel has been possible for some time and some people believe that space tourism could be developed in the future Do you think it is a positive or negative development 63
- Professional workers like doctors nurses and teachers make a greater contribution to society and so should be paid more than sports and entertainment personalities To what extent do you agree or disagree 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'often' is usually put after the verb 'are'.
Suggestion: are often
... eliminated. Firstly, the global groups often are reputable, which is helpful to raise pe...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 186, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ort of the international organizations.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, besides, but, first, firstly, if, so, still, therefore, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1867.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76234567901 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37506315317 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561728395062 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.8186309319 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.615384615 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9230769231 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.4615384615 7.06120827912 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2421970312 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0930270574889 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695554118376 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173957964603 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445238143256 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.