do you agree or disagree? in order to solve the problems in the present and future, it is vital to understand the past.
The question is whether for solving the troubles in the present or future is vital to be understood the past or not. Everyone with regard to his private view point may maintain a specific direction toward this issue. For instance, some believe having a strong knowledge about old times can be used as a powerful tool to perceive the current times while others have such a conviction that mentioned suggestion may be a waste time and money. I am unanimous with the latter group, so the next paragraphs will vastly elucidate my vantage point through three salient reasons:
To begin with, since my main field is archaeology, so I should confess that one of the most crucial purposes the aforementioned field is that archaeologist make efforts to trace the origins of life in the past eras to gain the knowledge about humans in spread spectrum. Such great data about living beings from the ancient periods until now can assist sociologists to solve the problems related to humans' societies; therefore, anthropologists and archaeologists provide valuable information for improving future communities. For instance, with pursuing the human's diets from 2500 B.C, researchers have proposed that a diet which was called Pablo diet and nowadays can help people to lose weight quickly.
The second reason for my argument lies the fact that knowing about different cultures or the win or failure stories during history will cause the youths to learn more lessons about life. There are a wide range of wealthy kings' biography or old scholars which motivate the young to imitate their way or not. Sometimes, reading about their mistakes and experiences will broaden people's view toward the world. One should not forget that mistakes are the most precious lesson of life that can be learned in the hard way; hence, having an understatement about past helps the young people to make logical decisions.
Moreover, nowadays, the world's changes have jeopardized the life of a variety of plant or animal species. For removing this problem, researchers attempt to trace the evolution of those species during history; consequently, with this approach, scientists will be able to receive information about their native location or diet which has changed in the years.
To sum up, this conclusion could be drawn that advantages of learning and understanding about history outweighs its disadvantages. One should notice that next generation would solve the ecosystem's problems or even more humans will make effort not to repeat the past's errors.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-08-18 | peerless alex | 90 | view |
- Tpo34 87
- Do you agree or disagree The teachers had a greater influence on the young people in the past than they do today 95
- Tpo39 3
- some students choose to enter the university immediately after high school however others prefer to take time before beginning the university class Which one is better 70
- tpo37 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 583, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: C
...h pursuing the humans diets from 2500 B.C, researchers have proposed that a diet ...
^
Line 5, column 222, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'kings'' or 'king's'?
Suggestion: kings'; king's
...life. There are a wide range of wealthy kings biography or old scholars which motivat...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, if, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, while, as to, for instance, to begin with, to sum up, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2126.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 410.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18536585366 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71212054644 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585365853659 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 642.6 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.4839723817 48.9658058833 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.857142857 100.406767564 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.2857142857 20.6045352989 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.35714285714 5.45110844103 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0833566108164 0.236089414692 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0350576946107 0.076458572812 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558984319009 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0525815633932 0.150856017488 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359530493899 0.0645574589148 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 11.7677419355 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.