Do you agree or disagree? People can solve important problems by themselves or by their families; thus, it is almost not necessary to refer to the government.
In the past, people often had solve their problems by themselves or by their families. As time passes, people in addition to their families refer to the government for solving disagreements. Personally speaking, I take issue with this statement that it is almost not necessary to refer to the government for finding solutions for conflicts. I strongly believe that referring to government has two main advantages. I will elaborate upon the momentous reasons in the following paragraphs.
The first point worth mentioning is that all people are equal before low which substantially increase the value of referring to the government. In my view, try as family members, they cannot help making a bias decisions. A prime example from my own experience would shade some light on this point. Several years ago, my husband and I got into the financial problem. My husband blames me for spending too much money and so did I. Eventually, we decided to consult with families. Not only could not they solve our problems, but also they made the situations even though since families’ opinion are absolutely bias. Therefore, having refer to the government, people can enjoy a solution which is not bias.
There is also a more subtle point we must consider. The government can provide the best solution for frictions inasmuch as they have been trained for this job. It goes without saying that lawyers, judges, counselors, to name but a few, have been trained in order to help people as well as possible. Frictions and difficulties would be solved much better by these people rather than by family members who do not have any academic knowledge about how to solve the problems. Besides, people usually abide by the decisions which make by the government. As an instance, several years ago, one of my co-workers owed me, but he did not want to give me the money back. I l had ground for complaint and I did it legally. Therefore, he gave my money back and we did not continue arguing anymore.
In the final analysis, according to above-mentioned points, assuredly people can confront with different frictions and difficulties by receiving help from government since their solutions are unbiased. Besides, too educated people are working for the government providing the most reasonable solutions for any friction. Why not accept this fact that the further helps from the government, the better solutions for the challenges which people face during their life?
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-16 | javadsafari | 76 | view |
| 2019-08-04 | javadsafari | 76 | view |
| 2019-07-16 | Mahimoon | 73 | view |
| 2018-12-07 | shivaaaa | 61 | view |
| 2017-08-30 | fereshtehRR | 73 | view |
- TPO36 3
- do you agree or disagree The way people dresses is a good indication of his or her personality or character 84
- TPO47 81
- It is important to read or watch news presented by people with different views than by similar view Do you agree or disagree 88
- Some teenager take part in different kinds of activities such as musical classes/ sports classes and so on, but others only focus on one activity which is important to them. Which one do you prefer? 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 21, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'often' is usually put between 'had' and 'solve'.
Suggestion: had often solve
In the past, people often had solve their problems by themselves or by thei...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 31, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'solved'.
Suggestion: solved
In the past, people often had solve their problems by themselves or by thei...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 31, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'solved'.
Suggestion: solved
In the past, people often had solve their problems by themselves or by thei...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, so, therefore, well, in addition, as well as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2049.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 406.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04679802956 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79104036716 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554187192118 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 632.7 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.5950316815 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.375 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9166666667 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.45110844103 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22454615714 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0647483126058 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0790958591855 0.0737576698707 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147154972737 0.150856017488 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0711389552866 0.0645574589148 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.