The charts below show the percentage of time younger and older people spend on various Internet activities in their free time.
Given are the pie-charts providing the distribution of time spent on the Internet by the young and old generation. It is clearly visible that the proportions of each group marginally differ.
A glance at the chart reveals that, the majority of people (24%) between 18 and 26 visit social networks while older people who are included into the 60-70 age groups prefer to book places at cinemas, travel etc. Furthermore, the second biggest share in terms of younger generations belongs to accessing media files with 21 % and it is marginally ahead of researches on the Internet (20 %). According to the first chart it can also be observed that, they spent 18 % of their time on playing games followed by purchasing some goods and booking places which indicates 12 % and 5 %, respectively.
In comparison with the young, older people are more likely to spend vast of their time on researching (26 %) and consuming goods (14%), whereas the other percentages showing playing games (6 %) and visiting social networks (8%) are almost three times less than younger people.
- The only way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities is by reducing the need for people to travel from home for work, education or shopping. 75
- The graphs below show the types of music albums purchased by people in Britain according to sex and age. 85
- Some people think that it is important to use leisure time for activities that improve the mind such as reading and doing word puzzles Other people feel that it is important to rest the mind during leisure time You should write at least 250 words You shou 68
- The chart below shows the different levels of post-school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999. 77
- Some employers reward members of staff for their expectional contribution to the company by giving them extra money This practice can act as an incentive for some but may also have a negative impact on others To what extent is this style effective Are the 85
flaws:
Avg. Sentence Length: 35 21.0
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 5 10
No. of Words: 175 200
No. of Characters: 846 1000
No. of Different Words: 114 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.637 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.834 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.619 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 58 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 42 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 28 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 19 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 35 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 19.121 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.6 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.482 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.762 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.07 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4