The charts below show the percentage of time younger and older people spend on various Internet activities in their free time.
Given are the pie-charts providing the distribution of time spent on the Internet by the young and old generation. It is clearly visible that the proportions of each group marginally differ.
A glance at the chart reveals that, the majority of people (24%) between 18 and 26 visit social networks while older people who are included into the 60-70 age groups prefer to book places at cinemas, travel etc. Furthermore, the second biggest share in terms of younger generations belongs to accessing media files with 21 % and it is marginally ahead of researches on the Internet (20 %). According to the first chart it can also be observed that, they spent 18 % of their time on playing games followed by purchasing some goods and booking places which indicates 12 % and 5 %, respectively.
In comparison with the young, older people are more likely to spend vast of their time on researching (26 %) and consuming goods (14%), whereas the other percentages showing playing games (6 %) and visiting social networks (8%) are almost three times less than younger people.
- The charts below give information about travel to and from the UK and about the most popular countries for UK residents to visit. 53
- Some say that it would be better if the majority of employees worked from home instead of travelling to a workplace everyday .Do you think the advantages of working from home outweigh the disadvantages ? 70
- Young people in the modern world seem to have more power and influence than any previous young generation Why is this the case What impact does this have on the relationship between old and young people 76
- The charts below give information on the ages of the population of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050. 80
- Chorleywood is a village near London whose population has increased steadily since the middle of the nineteenth century. The map below shows the development of the village.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the development of the village. 68
flaws:
Avg. Sentence Length: 35 21.0
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 5 10
No. of Words: 175 200
No. of Characters: 846 1000
No. of Different Words: 114 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.637 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.834 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.619 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 58 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 42 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 28 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 19 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 35 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 19.121 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.6 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.482 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.762 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.07 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4